Converting Epic Level Creatures

[freyar]

I'm ok with the change to tactics.

I'd like to increase the size of the maw to 150 ft as discussed in the nay-churr conversion.

 

[Cleon]

I'm ok with the change to tactics.

I'd like to increase the size of the maw to 150 ft as discussed in the nay-churr conversion.

That's fine by me.

Apart from the Bigger Engulf are we done with the Draeden?

 

[Shade]

That's fine by me.

Apart from the Bigger Engulf are we done with the Draeden?

Updated tactics and engulfing maw.

Are we actually finished?

 

[freyar]

I think so!

 

[Cleon]

I think so!

I'm thinking we should reword the "Decatuple Standard (gems)" treasure, (a) for the benefit of those who are unsure what decatuple means and (b) to make it clear how much coins and items it usually has.

The only typo I could find was a very minor one - the "80 ft." in Swallow Whole is missing the "." after the "ft".

 

[freyar]

How did you want to reword it? Just "10x standard (gems only)"?

 

[Shade]

How did you want to reword it? Just "10x standard (gems only)"?

I'm fine with that.

 

[GrayLinnorm]

If treasure is "gems only", it isn't really standard.

 

[Cleon]

How did you want to reword it? Just "10x standard (gems only)"?

Is that "10 x goods (gems only)" or "10 x coins, 10 x goods (gems only), 10 x items"?

If I remember the text, the former is what we want. If it hates material objects it would be unlikely to collect material treasure.

 

[Shade]

Is that "10 x goods (gems only)" or "10 x coins, 10 x goods (gems only), 10 x items"?

If I remember the text, the former is what we want. If it hates material objects it would be unlikely to collect material treasure.

Yes to the former. Or, in usual syntax:

No coins, 10 x goods (gems only), no items