Chaosmancer
Legend
So, the earlier discussion of "has WoTC released a good sourcebook for a setting" got me itching to try and decide if a good sourcebook has been made, if you don't have any preconceptions about the setting.
Was going to do Theros, but then the discussion turned to Spelljammer and I ended up making a monster post... which was too big to put here and likely to derail. So I made a new thread
TL;DR? I think the Spelljammer box set actually does act as a good sourcebook for a setting. It does a lot more than I think people realize, especially for people who don't have the expectation fo what spelljammer "should be"
Sad I've missed some of the more interesting discussions on this thread, but, took me a long time to get around to it.
Was going to do Theros, but then the discussion turned to Spelljammer and I ended up making a monster post... which was too big to put here and likely to derail. So I made a new thread
D&D General - Is Spelljammer really that bad?
So, slightly click-baity title, let me give context. I was reading through this thread (WotC - WotC needs an Elon Musk) about if WoTC needs Elon Musk, and one of the complaints that caught my eye amongst the various points of discussion was that WoTC has released "no good sourcebooks". Except...
www.enworld.org
TL;DR? I think the Spelljammer box set actually does act as a good sourcebook for a setting. It does a lot more than I think people realize, especially for people who don't have the expectation fo what spelljammer "should be"
Sad I've missed some of the more interesting discussions on this thread, but, took me a long time to get around to it.