Yaarel
🇮🇱 🇺🇦 He-Mage
5e goblins use scimitars.
I wouldnt call these "scimitars" because the edge isnt curving backward.
But they do look like some of the early weapons that later evolved into falchions. These were moreorless meat cleavers.
5e goblins use scimitars.
And if you weld two of them together you have a Warglauve of Azzinoth!It's a curved sword. If you're putting it in a Near Eastern-inspired setting, it's a scimitar. If you're putting it in a pirate-inspired setting, it's a cutlass. If you're putting it in a Skyrim-inspired setting, it's what those guards from Hammerfell used to use before they took an arrow to the knee.
Too much granularity makes the game difficult to follow; if we tried to list every weapon people used across the world from the Bronze Age through the Renaissance we'd have a table 10 pages long. The last time someone tried to do this was in 1e, with polearms, and the resultant profusion of bill-guisarmes, fauchard forks, and bec de corbins was a geek in-joke for the next 20 years.
While the samurai wore daisho, it was extremely rare for them to wield daisho. The two swords simply have two different functions, and most of the idea of a katana-in-one-hand and a wakizashi-in-the-other is assumed by people without a full picture of how they were used. It's more likely that a katana would be used one or two handed as a primary weapon and the wakizashi as a backup, or for close quarters fighting, or for other uses.Of course.
The wakizashi is clearly a:
• martial
• single-edge curving backward
• 1d6
• slashing
• finesse (agile)
• light (offhand)
• shortsword (bladelength between 1 to 2 feet)
They are contemporary with modern weapons from 1400s on.
Compare the "daisho" katana-and-wakizashi combination that eventually only samurai aristocracy were permitted to wear together. The wakizashi is an excellent example of the 5e (short) "scimitar".
![]()
This illustration is from a 5e book, the same edition where the stat block for goblins has a scimitar attack listed. The fact that the weapons they’re depicted using look almost nothing like the real-life historical weapon that shares a name with the one goblins use in their stat block goes to show that D&D scimitars, like all D&D weapons, don’t represent a specific real-world historical weapon, but rather a very broad weapon concept. D&D “scimitars” are just light, curved-bladed weapons. Their specific description is otherwise malleable.![]()
I wouldnt call these "scimitars" because the edge isnt curving backward.
But they do look like some of the early weapons that later evolved into falchions. These were moreorless meat cleavers.
I just have to pretend it’s a brigandineIf the stupidity that is "studded leather" is still hanging around then I'm not expecting any accuracy in weapons let me tell you,
They’re scimitars because the 5e goblin statblock says they are.![]()
I wouldnt call these "scimitars" because the edge isnt curving backward.
But they do look like some of the early weapons that later evolved into falchions. These were moreorless meat cleavers.
I just wish they'd call it that. They didn't keep "Broadswords" or "bastard swords" not sure why they keep "studded leather".I just have to pretend it’s a brigandine