overgeeked
Open-World Sandbox
I’m north of 42 and Doctor Who still fills me with wonder."This show has completely failed to fill me with childlike wonder! The fact that I'm 42 has nothing to do with it!"
I’m north of 42 and Doctor Who still fills me with wonder."This show has completely failed to fill me with childlike wonder! The fact that I'm 42 has nothing to do with it!"
That’s a great idea. Any idea what blog that was from?As to the Thief skills limiting other character options I read a blog a long time ago that suggested using thief skills like saving throws.
For ex: everyone can climb or pick pockets or disarm traps. I am old school way they tell you what they are doing and if it doesn’t trigger any bad stuff it just happens, if it does, then only the thief gets a roll to avoid it.
So every character can try those things, but the thief has an extra chance to escape calamity.
Made me consider using all skills in this way, sorta, maybe.
I’ve looked for it since, there are a few now that kinda cover it. I’ll see later about posting them here.That’s a great idea. Any idea what blog that was from?
Yep, this is becoming common in the old school circles. Some say that's what Gygax meant, but I have my doubts.As to the Thief skills limiting other character options I read a blog a long time ago that suggested using thief skills like saving throws.
For ex: everyone can climb or pick pockets or disarm traps. I am old school way they tell you what they are doing and if it doesn’t trigger any bad stuff it just happens, if it does, then only the thief gets a roll to avoid it.
So every character can try those things, but the thief has an extra chance to escape calamity.
Made me consider using all skills in this way, sorta, maybe.
I’ve been preaching it for a while. Not just for OSR games either.Yep, this is becoming common in the old school circles. Some say that's what Gygax meant, but I have my doubts.It's a good solution though.
The first book has an almost Roald Dahl feel to it. The nasty relatives making Harry sleep under the stairs is a good example, as well as the thousands of letters flooding the Dursley's house. Not suppose to make sense. The books got more serious (Rowling had stated they grow with the readers. Not sure if the shift in tone really works. Maybe?)They got super popular, however, with movies. Thus, more criticism.No, but I have a pretty high tolerance (preference?) for silliness.
It was pretty obvious from the get-go that the books weren't going to be about deep, coherent worldbuilding.
Stuff like the Mirror of Erised is meant to make 10 year olds happy when they figure it out.
Yep, this is becoming common in the old school circles. Some say that's what Gygax meant, but I have my doubts.It's a good solution though.
What??? Genesis of the Daleks was cinematic (small screen) genius!Or adults complaining that Doctor Who is “suddenly” campy or childish. No, it’s always been campy and childish. It’s a children’s show. Those adults just made the mistake of growing up.