Star Wars Rewatch

The Holdo Maneuver is an absolutely egregious destruction of canon until you can rationalize that it isn't. Here's my explanation for it, copied and pasted from a previous Star Wars thread:

The Holdo Maneuver has a really, really simple explanation. The only reason the ships collided is because of the hyperspace tether that the First Order used on the Resistance ship. Without the tether, the interaction would only have destroyed the Resistance ship (it's established elsewhere that you can die in hyperspace if you collide with a gravity well, which is why ships have safety mechanisms that drop you out of hyperspace before that happens; that's how an Interdictor works). The lack of a tether is why you can't use the Holdo Maneuver in every other space battle.

The other key element is that it was new tech, so neither side knew with certainty what would happen. This explains why Holdo was so cryptic about the plan: she didn't know if it would work or not. Turning off the hyperspace safety measures and trying it out was a last ditch "well, we're dead anyway, why not give this a try?" tactic. And it explains why no one in the First Order responded fast enough to stop her. Hux (and others) only realized what might happen at the last minute, which also explains their reactions.

Going further, this also explains why we don't see hyperspace tethers used again. People now know that if a capital ship uses one, it puts a huge target on their backs; safer to stick with the old-school Interdictor style gravity wells. You could, however, have a suicide squad sneak a hyperspace tether onto a ship or outpost specifically to employ the technique.
I think this is a good explanation for it, but I don't think it is well justified in the movies. IIRC they refer to it as a "hyperspace tracker", not "hyperspace tether". And I don't think there is anything in the movies to suggest the hyperspace tracker would make this possible, or that Holdo's tactic was used for that reason.

It reminds me of Elijah Wood's post..."No. How could we have known"?
 

log in or register to remove this ad


TIL that Star Wars fans used a character’s hair color to argue a point. :wow:

boburnham-inside.gif
 

Heh. I have to admit, I stay VERY far away from any Star Wars conversations on the Internet. I try to stay VERY far away from any fandom anymore because I just can't handle it anymore. It sucks all the joy away and makes me walk away from stuff that I used to like.

I've learned my lesson. Granted, I might need a reminder from time to time, like this thread, but, this thread has been pretty tame, so, it serves as a gentle reminder.
 

Heh. I have to admit, I stay VERY far away from any Star Wars conversations on the Internet. I try to stay VERY far away from any fandom anymore because I just can't handle it anymore. It sucks all the joy away and makes me walk away from stuff that I used to like.

I've learned my lesson. Granted, I might need a reminder from time to time, like this thread, but, this thread has been pretty tame, so, it serves as a gentle reminder.
I do not see it as the fandom. It is social media and the internet. When I interact with fans or have conversations with people, then it is a far different scenario. Fandom is just fine when you do not have people intentionally manipulating the audience, being affected by algorithms, or non-fan trolls having fun causing angst.

I do not like the sequels because it is clear that they had no unified vision. TFA tries to hit every beat from ANH and TLJ does the same for ESB although it is better hidden. Either they had no unifying vision from TFA to TLJ or they threw it out because someone had a new shiny.

I am glad some people like ST. I have watched each of the movies about 5-6 times and just cannot enjoy them....other than TFA. I can still enjoy that film.

I understand @Gradine viewpoints and I am happy for them but I do not agree with them. The film is artistically beautiful with bad characters, pacing, and overall story. I do not think it was done to intentionally upset anyone. I just think it was a film where a director wanted to take Star Wars in a different direction. It would have worked for a non-trilogy attempt. It does not work as the second to last of a 9-film saga.
 

I would also say that the Star Wars aesthetic changed (notably, but not completely) between the original trilogy to the prequel trilogy. The sequels have all been vastly closer to the originals.
I love the grimy industrial look of the OT, and absolutely hated the shiny retrofuturism of the Prequels. In addition, the transition between the two feels totally inorganic (and some of the hybrid designs are truly hideous). The Sequels unambitious update on the OT designs was a much better move.
 

Remove ads

Top