I have a bad feeling about this...Maybe the Neogi are getting the Markab treatment?
They're not going to be made not-evil, they are going to be made extinct.
So, whose flying those spider-ships? Maybe their rebellious umber hulk ex-slaves?
Have we even seen any pictures of Neogi in 5E yet?Maybe the Neogi are getting the Markab treatment?
They're not going to be made not-evil, they are going to be made extinct.
So, whose flying those spider-ships? Maybe their rebellious umber hulk ex-slaves?
They're in Volo's and Monsters of the Multiverse.Have we even seen any pictures of Neogi in 5E yet?
The internet seems to suggesting "no".
Oh good point, let's look what it says MotM.They're in Volo's and Monsters of the Multiverse.
The OP took a quote, added a lot of supposition, and then launched this thread. There hasn't been any evidence that the neogi still aren't slavers - in fact 5e material thus far actually argues the opposite. They may indeed have changed this, but its nothing but supposition on very flimsy evidence at this point. Until the product is actually released, or they drop some actual info on this matter, I'm not sure why this is even being discussed.I admit not understanding why having evil slave traders in a game is bad. At least we know they're evil, so fighting them makes sense.... Like, I just don't get this. But then, I'm old and white, so maybe my experience doesn't help me here.
I had thought that was the case. Still, they could be mostly extinct.They're in Volo's and Monsters of the Multiverse.
I'm pretty sure I made it clear that I thought it was interesting that Crawford did not include neogi when asked. That's why it is being discussed -- because it is potentially interesting. I did make any claims at all, so don't paint it that way, thank you.The OP took a quote, added a lot of supposition, and then launched this thread. There hasn't been any evidence that the neogi still aren't slavers - in fact 5e material thus far actually argues the opposite. They may indeed have changed this, but its nothing but supposition on very flimsy evidence at this point. Until the product is actually released, or they drop some actual info on this matter, I'm not sure why this is even being discussed.
The write up for the Neogi adult mentions they have no compunctions about using their mind control abilities on others, and the actual ability in question is named "Enslave" in their statblock.Oh god point, let's look what it says MotM.
Ok - in MotM the write-up/wording for Neogi is pretty similar to previous editions, except it carefully avoids using the term slavery or "property", or talking about how the Neogi abuse their mind-control, just that they think it's fine to mind-control others (does that make them any different to your average D&D party lol?). That's interesting and not great, because it suggests WotC might be trying to avoid even implying they're slavers, which means they'd be more or less impossible to discuss. Hence they might be largely excluded from 5E Spelljammer. Interestingly the Neogi mind-control ability is called Enslave, and unfortunately, because it recharges so rarely (on a rest) and only last 1 day, it means traditional Neogi mind-slaving would be impossible.
Yes I was just editing to note that.The write up for the Neogi adult mentions they have no compunctions about using their mind control abilities on others, and the actual ability in question is named "Enslave" in their statblock.
![]()
Mordenkainen Presents: Monsters of the Multiverse
A bestiary of wondrous friends and foes for the world’s greatest roleplaying gamewww.dndbeyond.com