Voadam
Legend
I have had no interest in seeing any of them . . . until reading this.So you're saying you preferred the franchise from before it became "Dungeons & Dragons with cars"?
I have had no interest in seeing any of them . . . until reading this.So you're saying you preferred the franchise from before it became "Dungeons & Dragons with cars"?
A couple I used to get blurred in many years ago when they were much, much younger.
Ray Liotta v Robert Patrick
and
John Cusack v Robert Downey Jr.
Y'all are going to hate me but I'm going with Irons being the poor man due to Dungeons and Dragons movie. Im letting that be the tie breaker.
Jeremy Irons is no stranger to putting his foot in his mouth either, but he's also the only actor in the entire cast of Dungeons & Dragons (2000) who understood the assignment and devoured every piece of scenery in a five-km radius and that kind of conviction deserves to be rewarded, quite frankly.
Boy, lots of opinions on his role in Dungeons & Dragons (2000). I honestly treat it as a non-event in judging his acting. I mean, he wasn't trying to act 'well,' he was trying to salvage a bad situation. He found himself in a movie he knew darn well was going to be a nightmare and decided to still have some fun making it. Honestly, that's better than just phoning it in*, getting sloshed every day*, or actively trying to sabotage the movie**. It's not quite to the level of Raul Julia elevating his part in Street Fighter (1994) to a great performance in a bad movie, but what he turned out was entertaining to him and entertaining (if not good) for the audience. Mostly it's just a 'no score drawn' in my judgement of him as an actor.And as terrible as the movie and his performance is in it, he's the best thing about the Dungeons and Dragons movie.
And to pay for his castle, of course.Boy, lots of opinions on his role in Dungeons & Dragons (2000). I honestly treat it as a non-event in judging his acting. I mean, he wasn't trying to act 'well,' he was trying to salvage a bad situation. He found himself in a movie he knew darn well was going to be a nightmare and decided to still have some fun making it. (...)
Boy, lots of opinions on his role in Dungeons & Dragons (2000). I honestly treat it as a non-event in judging his acting. I mean, he wasn't trying to act 'well,' he was trying to salvage a bad situation. He found himself in a movie he knew darn well was going to be a nightmare and decided to still have some fun making it. Honestly, that's better than just phoning it in*, getting sloshed every day*, or actively trying to sabotage the movie**. It's not quite to the level of Raul Julia elevating his part in Street Fighter (1994) to a great performance in a bad movie, but what he turned out was entertaining to him and entertaining (if not good) for the audience. Mostly it's just a 'no score drawn' in my judgement of him as an actor.
*Bill Murray tried helping re-write the Garfield (2004) movie he signed onto after realizing the Joel Cohen who wrote it wasn't one of the Cohen brothers, but by the time they got to the voice acting, he had clearly checked out.