I am in favor, because the current system really doesn't work.
Who would be the senior reviewers? Any volunteers/nominees?
I am for it as long as we amend the proposal to allow a CB .pdf to be used instead of the normal template.
In addition, anyone who links the CB .pdf also has to link an export of their CB character. That way, a reviewer who does want to check out the math can do so importing the file and by just clicking on each power within CB.
I think if we are going to improve the system, we should do so big time, not just with tiny incremental improvements.