Irda Ranger
First Post
In the recent Customizing Monsters preview the concept of the Magical Threshold was introduced. There is much discussion on that topic in other threads as far as monsters are concerned, but I want to talk about how this can be introduced for PCs.
First off, I'm one of those DMs who wants to run a less-than-D&D-standard-item campaign. One or two iconic items per PC, tops. None of this "fill every slot" business. That doesn't work for me. That's why I've been pretty excited by the transparency in "'+x' expectations" built into the rules. Right now I think you can give all PCs a +1 bonus to attacks, damage, AC and Defense every 4 levels and be done with it. The numbers might change there, but the idea shouldn't.
But now we have this Magical Threshold concept, and I am intrigued. Perhaps we keep +x items, but the + from the item does not stack with the +1 you get every 4 levels. To move away from "but Martial characters aren't magical!" attacks, we'll say that both items and leveling grant you a non-stacking "Awesome Bonus." Dwarven Fighters may not be magical, but they are awesome. So are magic axes.

But I didn't just bring a new rule for you! I have an idea for building on this concept for your campaign!
What happens is that you no longer go down to Ye Olde Magic Shoppe and commission a +3 sword. The best you can do is commission a Masterwork Sword with the Memory Item descriptor. At first blush this weapon appears to be no more than a normal Masterwork item. But with time (i.e., after leveling twice) it will grow with the character and assume the qualities inherent to all magical items (occasionally glowing, pierces certain resistances, greater Hardness and HP, etc.). It may also acquire qualities that complement the wielder, such that the mace of Erais Sunlord counts as a Radiant weapon for purposes of monster Vulnerabilities (I'm looking as you, Vampire Template). This level of "item dependency" is "just right" for my campaign, but you can probably take this concept and tweak it for yours.
And if you want to hark back to the old days of Aligned and/or Sentient Weapons, now you know where the alignment and/or sentience comes from: the shards of personality imprinted by the item's most powerful former wielders.
But the reallycoolbodacious benefits of Memory Items are in the story elements.
Now you know why the blade of Ashen Shugar must be feared, even in the hands of a novice.
Now when your 3rd level PCs find a +2 sword you can describe how the memories of battles long past seem to flow from the hilt into your mind, and you find your balance and stance altering in subtle ways as the wisdom of a dozen warriors informs you. A name comes to you: Tomas of the Tsarai Hills, let me tell you of my battles with the Hill Giants.
Now you know why each King's Champion passes on his sword to his successor. Now you know why an Officer's Sword of the Xth Legion is of such importance.
And if you're running an old Gygaxian adventure, now you know why +1 items are everywhere. Lots of people make it to 4th level.
First off, I'm one of those DMs who wants to run a less-than-D&D-standard-item campaign. One or two iconic items per PC, tops. None of this "fill every slot" business. That doesn't work for me. That's why I've been pretty excited by the transparency in "'+x' expectations" built into the rules. Right now I think you can give all PCs a +1 bonus to attacks, damage, AC and Defense every 4 levels and be done with it. The numbers might change there, but the idea shouldn't.
But now we have this Magical Threshold concept, and I am intrigued. Perhaps we keep +x items, but the + from the item does not stack with the +1 you get every 4 levels. To move away from "but Martial characters aren't magical!" attacks, we'll say that both items and leveling grant you a non-stacking "Awesome Bonus." Dwarven Fighters may not be magical, but they are awesome. So are magic axes.
The Crunch: PCs gain a +1 Awesome Bonus to AC and Defenses and all attack and damage rolls equal to 1/4 their level (Max: +7; rounded down). This bonus does not stack with the Awesome Bonus from magical weapons, armors or cloaks/amulets.
Personally, I like the idea of some kid finding a magic sword and gaining a real benefit from it, but that as he becomes a more proficient warrior it becomes less and less the sword that matters and more and more the man. I also really dislike the "arms race" mentality at higher levels, and this is a nice way to deal with it. For those of you in the audience who like PCs and NPCs/Monsters to be treated the same, are you a little happier now? 
But I didn't just bring a new rule for you! I have an idea for building on this concept for your campaign!
More Crunch, but now with Implied Setting!: Any weapon, armor, shield or amulet with the Memory Item descriptor absorbs the qualities of its bearer. If worn or wielded relatively continuously (DM's discretion) while the bearer levels up twice consecutively the Memory Item assumes the same Level and Awesome Bonus as its bearer. It may also absorb certain other qualities of its Bearer appropriate for the Item's level (DM's discretion).
Magic swords, as you call them, may be first forged by some elven wizard or dwarven master smith, but a magic sword's life only begins there; that is merely the first step in a long journey. Through use and experience the sword learns as its wielder does, and from him. It absorbs his hard-won fighting skills, his qualities, and sometimes even his beliefs.What happens is that you no longer go down to Ye Olde Magic Shoppe and commission a +3 sword. The best you can do is commission a Masterwork Sword with the Memory Item descriptor. At first blush this weapon appears to be no more than a normal Masterwork item. But with time (i.e., after leveling twice) it will grow with the character and assume the qualities inherent to all magical items (occasionally glowing, pierces certain resistances, greater Hardness and HP, etc.). It may also acquire qualities that complement the wielder, such that the mace of Erais Sunlord counts as a Radiant weapon for purposes of monster Vulnerabilities (I'm looking as you, Vampire Template). This level of "item dependency" is "just right" for my campaign, but you can probably take this concept and tweak it for yours.
And if you want to hark back to the old days of Aligned and/or Sentient Weapons, now you know where the alignment and/or sentience comes from: the shards of personality imprinted by the item's most powerful former wielders.
But the really
Now you know why the blade of Ashen Shugar must be feared, even in the hands of a novice.
Now when your 3rd level PCs find a +2 sword you can describe how the memories of battles long past seem to flow from the hilt into your mind, and you find your balance and stance altering in subtle ways as the wisdom of a dozen warriors informs you. A name comes to you: Tomas of the Tsarai Hills, let me tell you of my battles with the Hill Giants.
Now you know why each King's Champion passes on his sword to his successor. Now you know why an Officer's Sword of the Xth Legion is of such importance.
And if you're running an old Gygaxian adventure, now you know why +1 items are everywhere. Lots of people make it to 4th level.

Last edited: