Is Evil Genius Games Doubling Down On NFTs & Blockchain?

Screenshot 2024-06-18 at 16.55.19.png

Evil Genius Games' Dave Scott presents to a panel of judges at a cryptocurrency convention in May 2024

Earlier this year, it was revealed that Evil Genius Games--publisher of the d20 Modern inspired Everyday Heroes TTRPG--was considering use of certain controversial Web3 technologies, such as non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and blockchains. In response to that, EGG published a manifesto on February 6th, 2024, which they called their 'Technology Code of Ethics' in which the company pledged not to use blockchain or cryptocurrencies (along with AI, and other pledges). Indeed, Scott himself told me back in February that the company had decided not to use blockchain technology. For a full background on EGG and recent events, you can read more in The Rise And Fall Of Evil Genius Games.

#2: Evil Genius Games will not use Blockchain or Cryptocurrency technologies in the building or operation of its technology platform.

At the end of 2023 and the start of 2024 numerous employees resigned from Evil Genius Games citing--amongst other things--ethical concerns with the technologies that the company was planning to use, something which Dave Scott made public assurances that they would not do. At the time Scott said: “We made the decision not to do AI in October, and then not to do Web3 in December. But apparently, it wasn't enough to allay any concerns. So after the resignations, we brought the team together to discuss. And we felt a public and permanent statement on this issue would be useful. That's why we drafted the code of ethics after the fact.” In fact, back when I spoke to Scott in February of this year, one of the questions I asked him was why the staff who had recently resigned from EGG did not believe him when he repeated that the company did not intend to use those controversial technologies, and he indicated to me that he didn't know why that was the case.

EGG Pitches At Consensus 2024
However, last week, EGG participated in a pitch competition at an event at Consensus 2024, a convention in Texas run by Coindesk. Consensus describes itself as "the world's largest, longest-running and most influential gathering that brings together all sides of the cryptocurrency, blockchain and Web3 community". EGG's owner Dave Scott pitched a future for their TTRPG offerings which leaned heavily on both blockchains and on non-fungible tokens. Scott introduced the company and told the attendees that "we make turn-based RPGs on chain based on famous Blockbuster movie franchises that we all know and love."

Interestingly, Scott also stated that Jeff Grubb (Dragonlance, d20 Modern) works for the company and describes him as "the father of modern day Dungeons and Dragons"; Grubb made it clear earlier this year that he had no current involvement with Evil Genius Games. In my previous delve into EGG, it turned out that Grubb's participation in Everyday Heroes was that he wrote the foreword in 2023.

I'm not the best person on the staff. Meet Jeff Grub. Jeff Grub is the father of modern day Dungeons and Dragons.

Screenshot 2024-06-18 at 16.53.09.png

So how do NFTs fit into this vision? Dave Scott described it as follows:

Imagine a scenario where you could actually buy NFT utilities that are exclusive to these licenses you could actually pilot Gypsy Danger, you can carry Rambo's M60, all of these that have value that can be bought sold and traded but more importantly in the Roblox fashion we're going to allow other people to actually create their own NFTs which can be thrown onto a marketplace where they can buy, sell and trade those adventures as well.

Screenshot 2024-06-18 at 16.49.56.png


Scott's pitch can be watched below--in the video the CEO presented an NFT and blockchain powered future for Evil Genius Games' tabletop offerings in front of three judges, who then proceeded to ask him questions about the pitch.

During the Q&A which followed, Scott confirmed that there was no actual NFT technology in place yet, indicating that "we've just started to set up the infrastructure to be able to create the NFT program". He also claimed that the company has made $1.2M in revenue in the last year based on sales of digital products.

When asked about the blockchain components of the setup, Scott described the content creator marketplace.

All the Creator Marketplace components of it, the UGC components of it, the entire utility is on chain. If you've actually played RPGs before there's a character sheet, all the components of the character sheet will have objects on it, all the objects will be NFTs. In addition to that the actual character sheet itself will be minted as an NFT as well so what that means is that if we use your character as an NPC in a future game we'll actually pay you royalties on the character itself. So the whole thing is based off of objects which are have NFT components to it.

He went on to describe some of the more technical aspects of the platform, including the use of a 'wallet-as-a-service' company called Stardust. Stardust's mission statement is to "democratise blockchain technology for developers and players at scale".

What we're really excited about is the idea that we can use blockchain to be able to control the value and to create value around the objects which make up your character, that's going to be a really important component of it so if you actually create for example an adventure on our system that'll be something that you own as the creator from here on out but the experience we're going after is a Web2 experience which means that we don't want to expose the wallet, we're going to be using a company called Stardust be able to create custodial wallets for that reason.



This was part of a competition, which--as it happens--Evil Genius Games won!

To Pledge Or Not To Pledge?
Whether or not one supports the idea of blockchains and NFTs, Evil Genius Games did make a very public pledge not to use blockchains--and reiterated to staff, to me, and on forums that they did not plan to go ahead with that course. This presentation appears to indicate otherwise, with CEO Dave Scott declaring his intentions towards both blockchains and NFTs in a very public venue.

Screenshot 2024-06-18 at 17.26.58.png

EGG's technology Code of Ethics, published in February 2024
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

Commoditizing each individual game element is definitely not a sustainable model. An AL version of this is going to be such a small audience, many who aren't looking for high buy-in; they just want a game to play in!

Even DDB is removing piecemeal/micro transactions, and Hasbro is already in the NFT market, so they would have the best data on this sort of thing. If they know not to do it...
 

Despite all the hate for web3 and NFT here, it's not a bad plan.
I think it is a bad plan…

NFTs are not just cute pictures you collect. They have technological uses.
I am aware, I do not consider this to be one of them

It could drive a "collectible" RPG platform where you play online and build characters with these components. Standard components are cheap and easy (STR 14 = $2), and others are more expensive (Alien artifact that gives you STR 20 = $25).
this assumes sufficient interest in that kind of thing when most people see it as a red flag…
 
Last edited:


And if you think there isn't a market for this, right now Steam is being overtaken by a banana clicking game


Basically because it spits out sellable skins.
from the article “Namely, because most of those players are bots. You see, this idle clicker game is a money printer. And I don't mean that as a dig at like freemium games or anything: Click the banana enough, and you earn in-game skins that can be sold for real-world cash.”

Sounds like the stupid version of crypto mining
 

Commoditizing each individual game element is definitely not a sustainable model. An AL version of this is going to be such a small audience, many who aren't looking for high buy-in; they just want a game to play in!

Even DDB is removing piecemeal/micro transactions, and Hasbro is already in the NFT market, so they would have the best data on this sort of thing. If they know not to do it...
True, I'm not sure who the market actually is. In a typical game thenDM assigns gear, do they have to buy the various magical items and pass them out? Are the expected to ask for cash before awarding them? I'm really not sure how this is meant to work.
 

This is intended as a serious question: aren't Blockchain and NFT's already not a thing anymore?
Sadly, no. For a long time to come, there will be people who've newly discovered them, see "$$$!" and start hyping them. The leading edge of awareness has moved past them, but the trailing edge has not yet discovered them.
Now, dealing with a business owner who lies and misleads to run their company? It doesn't help Web3 that so many charlatans use it to deceive and rob people.
So many, in fact, that it starts to seem like the main point.
 

Whether or not one supports the idea of blockchains and NFTs, Evil Genius Games did make a very public pledge not to use blockchains--and reiterated to staff, to me, and on forums that they did not plan to go ahead with that course. This presentation appears to indicate otherwise, with CEO Dave Scott declaring his intentions towards both blockchains and NFTs in a very public venue.
 

There are advantages to using blockchain technology. On the network I work with, transactions are fast and cheap. So, there's very little overhead for verification or querying. Minting is not as fast, but for most people, it would be considered fast (if you know what I mean. :)

Most of the vitriol here seems to be based on bad actors doing bad things. The hype didn't stack up. I get that. The technology has applications, and using NFTs as "things" rather than "cool pics" is solid. There's more to blockchain than charlatans and hype.
This is really a non answer but out of curiosity how fast are your transactions?
 

We had a good hobby for decades before Evil Genius' NFT plans, WotC's D&D monthly subscriptions, et al.
On principle, I don't want to support any businesses like this. I don't want to buy any game dependent on the business giving me permission to do so and forcing me to play it the way they want.
 

Trending content

Related Articles

Remove ads

Trending content

Remove ads

Top