Recent content by Horwath

This is the early draft. there is allegedly newer out there, but didn't find it. Yet.

Rare, sometimes blue. I can also steal medium rare from others plate to try :p

I actually like Vicious weapons the best. With following bounded accuracy design goal, they work better than +X items Hence the following house ruled items. Magic weapons: Common: +1 damage Uncommon: +1d6 damage Rare: +2d6 damage Very rare: +3d6 damage Legendary: +4d6 damage Magic armor...

this. I have more than 200 games in my Steam library. more than half I didn't even install as I do not have time to play them yet, but they were on 80-95% discount so I got them for next to nothing.

It would be hard to vote as we do not know what will be the impact of the 1st choice and rest are still to happen(hopefully not) and in what aspect will the rest happen?

I'm sure that blacksmithing assistants were also pissed when power hammers came out on market.

Worse than EA?

agree, probably not. As I said, some spells need to be removed or reduced in power. more like it was WotC that repeatedly claimed that new players are too stupid to understand anything more than rolling a d20. Sure, they said it more politely: "they do not want to overwhelm new players with...

well, guess if you make a caster a class, you should balance it with a non caster, what a shock. maybe add battlemaster features to all martials at a different pace(similar to A5E) so that will compensate for power difference. or just remove most hard crowd control spells from the game, damage...

we had simple solution back in the days for bad and really bad feats. Really bad feats: you could take 3 of those for a single feat slot bad feats: 2 for 1 slot rest: 1 for 1 as normal.

if you turn subclass features into feats, assumption is made that the features will be rebalanced to value of full feats or half feats. and that classes will balanced around those extra 4 or 5 feat slots.

heh, Leadership is like nuclear weapons, either all got that feat, or we agree that none will take it. Luckily we all liked PHB2 version of druid that explicitly prohibits use of Natural spell feat. and honestly, I think that to date, it's the best version of Wild shape in any edition.

What is the difference between having a subclass feature at level 10 and having a feat that has level 10 requirement? maybe even a class requirement if the feature is keyed of some base class ability.

cleric was a powerhouse, luckily, most people found it boring or played them as a healbot, so in most instances it didn't break much. Most usages for cleric I was was a 1 level dip for domains and devotion feats powered by turn undead. but probably worse was wizard+incantatrix+persistent...