darjr
I crit!
The taldorei pdf is beautiful.So leave it as a web page. PDFs look crappy no matter who does it.
The taldorei pdf is beautiful.So leave it as a web page. PDFs look crappy no matter who does it.
A "beautiful" PDF is counterproductive. It's expensive to print, and like every other PDF, it looks bad on a screen.The taldorei pdf is beautiful.
It looks amazing on screen. I especially love the double tap behavior on my ipad and the swipe stuff. Plus I have a broad choice of annotation software.A "beautiful" PDF is counterproductive. It's expensive to print, and like every other PDF, it looks bad on a screen.
D&D rules shouldn't be "beautiful", they should be clear. Formatting is a waste, what matters is the text, maps and art for use in game.
Designing a document for PDF and designing a document for a web format are two different jobs. It's not profitable for a commercial company to do both. Since we can only have one format, I choose Web format, which is much easier to make accessible to dyslexics like myself. Not to mention the colour blind and partially sighted.You don't like them? Don't buy them, don't read them, don't use them. No one is trying to convince you to do so. Why do you keep trying to convince us not to use them? It's honestly baffling
I am dyslexic as well, but I fail to understand how a web format is better for me than a PDF. Do you care to explain?Designing a document for PDF and designing a document for a web format are two different jobs. It's not profitable for a commercial company to do both. Since we can only have one format, I choose Web format, which is much easier to make accessible to dyslexics like myself. Not to mention the colour blind and partially sighted.
Yes, but they are already designing it for print and web. If you are designing for print, it is pretty trivial to make a PDF of it.Designing a document for PDF and designing a document for a web format are two different jobs.
Not that trivial. As pointed out a "professionally produced" PDF looks better than an amateur one. This is because time, effort, skill and more expensive software has gone into preparing it.Yes, but they are already designing it for print and web. If you are designing for print, it is pretty trivial to make a PDF of it.
IDK, I have done a fair bit of graphic layout for print and it has always been pretty easy to make a PDF with Indesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, etc. Now, the bookmarking used to take some time, but it seems the newer versions of software have even streamlined that process.Not that trivial. As pointed out a "professionally produced" PDF looks better than an amateur one. This is because time, effort, skill and more expensive software has gone into preparing it.
There are a number of different causes for dyslexia (I've had lots of long debates about clasifcation), so exact needs will vary. Which is kind of the point, PDF is hard to change.That being said, I am more interested about your dyslexia comment. As both my daughter and I are dyslexic I am curious how or why web content is /could be better for us?