Ok, here's the scenario.
We run into a Vampire who uses his domination gaze attack on my PC who fails his Will save. Vampire orders my PC to "subdue the Cleric using the most effective means available."
Being a Wilder, I summon an astral construct and instruct it to grapple the Cleric and deal subdual damage until he goes down. Problem: Cleric has freedom of movement cast, so my construct just starts to deal subdual damage after I realize that Cleric cannot be grappled.
In the meantime, I realize that I have no pure offensive powers capable of dealing non-lethal damage so I metamorph into a Frost Giant and start beating on the Cleric for subdual damage.
However, by changing forms and types, I am now no longer a legal target for the dominate person spell.
My DM ruled that although the Vampire can issue me no further commands I still must (a) complete the last stated order and (b) not turn on the Vampire. However, once I complete (a), I may do anything I wish as long as it does not result in (b).
I know this is more of an interpretation and not a RAW question, but do you think this is fair? Any support from Sage Advice or the like?
Thanks!
We run into a Vampire who uses his domination gaze attack on my PC who fails his Will save. Vampire orders my PC to "subdue the Cleric using the most effective means available."
Being a Wilder, I summon an astral construct and instruct it to grapple the Cleric and deal subdual damage until he goes down. Problem: Cleric has freedom of movement cast, so my construct just starts to deal subdual damage after I realize that Cleric cannot be grappled.
In the meantime, I realize that I have no pure offensive powers capable of dealing non-lethal damage so I metamorph into a Frost Giant and start beating on the Cleric for subdual damage.
However, by changing forms and types, I am now no longer a legal target for the dominate person spell.
My DM ruled that although the Vampire can issue me no further commands I still must (a) complete the last stated order and (b) not turn on the Vampire. However, once I complete (a), I may do anything I wish as long as it does not result in (b).
I know this is more of an interpretation and not a RAW question, but do you think this is fair? Any support from Sage Advice or the like?
Thanks!
Last edited: