• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D General D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?

A WizKids miniature reveals the iconic character's face for the first time.

Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.27.52.png


The Dungeons & Dragons Red Box, famously illustrated by Larry Elmore in 1983, featured cover art of a warrior fighting a red dragon. The piece is an iconic part of D&D's history.

WizKids is creating a 50th Anniversary D&D miniatures set for the D&D Icons of the Realms line which includes models based on classic art from the game, such as the AD&D Player's Handbook's famous 'A Paladin In Hell' piece by David Sutherland in 1978, along with various monsters and other iconic images. The set will be available in July 2024.

Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.31.00.png

paladininhell.jpg

Amongst the collection is Elmore's dragon-fighting warrior. This character has only ever been seen from behind, and has never been named or identified. However, WizKids’ miniature gives us our first look at them from the front. The warrior is a woman; the view from behind is identical to the original art, while the view from the front--the first time the character's face has ever been seen--is, as WizKids told ComicBook.com, "purposefully and clearly" a woman. This will be one of 10 secret rare miniatures included in the D&D Icons of the Realms: 50th Anniversary booster boxes.


redboxwarriormini.png




s-l1600.jpg

The original artist, Larry Elmore, says otherwise. (Update—the linked post has since been edited).

It's a man!

Gary didn't know what he wanted, all he wanted was something simple that would jump out at you. He wanted a male warrior. If it was a woman, you would know it for I'm pretty famous for painting women.

There was never a question in all these years about the male warrior.

No one thought it was a female warrior. "Whoever thought it was a female warrior is quite crazy and do not know what they are talking about."

This is stupid. I painted it, I should know.
- Larry Elmore​

Whether or not Elmore's intent was for the character to be a man, it seems that officially she's a woman. Either way, it's an awesome miniature. And for those who love the art, you can buy a print from Larry Elmore's official website.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad


I can say this. When you learn about art, such as taking an Art History class in college, the very first thing you do is try to understand the painting's context - that is both studying the artist and the time in which it was made. That is why, say if you had someone looking at a Frida Kahlo painting, and they made fun of and wanted to change the long necks or the plant roots everywhere, you might understand they know nothing about her or the context of its creation. We would, at the least, consider them naive, and we may even consider their critique or the changes they would want to make ignorant. Some might go so far to say they are moronic.

If that same someone explained the long necks and roots, but then went on to say they wanted to reimagine it with shorter necks and no roots, I doubt anyone would blink an eye. This is especially true if it's about one artist discussing another artist.

In the end, it's about communication. WizKids either didn't know, or pretended not to know, the context of this painting. Whether their sculptor (if it's not already done by AI?) knew the details, we'll never know. But we do know they didn't communicate anything. (And depending on what camp you are in, they should have or didn't need to.)
 


You are the problem. The very problem this hobby is facing.
What problem? The hobby (D&D and RPGs in general) is doing better than ever! Is the problem in your mind: being more excepting to different peoples, ideas, and viewpoints? I don't think that is a problem, but an asset.

I've been playing D&D for 33+ years and I am happy with the direction of the hobby. So no problem in my eyes.
 

Some Dude

Explorer
What's weird about this hubbub to me is that Elmore was doing work for hire here. The final product wasn't even what he originally envisioned and proposed. His original sketch was larger, and had two more figures in the foreground. It was, IMO, a better piece of art, and more representative of the game. The red box cover always seemed "cramped" to me, I never knew why until I saw the original idea. This wasn't some unfettered work of artistic expression. It was spec work done at the direction of Gary Gygax. That doesn't make it bad art, it certainly isn't. But it also doesn't make it some sacred work, to be venerated as sacrosanct.
 

Some Dude

Explorer
What problem? The hobby (D&D and RPGs in general) is doing better than ever! Is the problem in your mind: being more excepting to different peoples, ideas, and viewpoints? I don't think that is a problem, but an asset.

I've been playing D&D for 33+ years and I am happy with the direction of the hobby. So no problem in my eyes.
Hard same, I'm 52, been paying since I was 10. Inclusivity is important to the hobby, and makes it better.
 


Just when you think people can't get more serious and over the top about what is ultimately a truly silly topic to begin with, someone proves you can always get more serious and over the top.

I look forward to the epic debate over whether the dragon is really a red dragon, or was an orange dragon all along.

Don't be absurd, its not orange, everyone knows its been purple this whole time 😜😂
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top