• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D General D&D Red Box: Who Is The Warrior?

A WizKids miniature reveals the iconic character's face for the first time.

Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.27.52.png


The Dungeons & Dragons Red Box, famously illustrated by Larry Elmore in 1983, featured cover art of a warrior fighting a red dragon. The piece is an iconic part of D&D's history.

WizKids is creating a 50th Anniversary D&D miniatures set for the D&D Icons of the Realms line which includes models based on classic art from the game, such as the AD&D Player's Handbook's famous 'A Paladin In Hell' piece by David Sutherland in 1978, along with various monsters and other iconic images. The set will be available in July 2024.

Screenshot 2024-05-07 at 22.31.00.png

paladininhell.jpg

Amongst the collection is Elmore's dragon-fighting warrior. This character has only ever been seen from behind, and has never been named or identified. However, WizKids’ miniature gives us our first look at them from the front. The warrior is a woman; the view from behind is identical to the original art, while the view from the front--the first time the character's face has ever been seen--is, as WizKids told ComicBook.com, "purposefully and clearly" a woman. This will be one of 10 secret rare miniatures included in the D&D Icons of the Realms: 50th Anniversary booster boxes.


redboxwarriormini.png




s-l1600.jpg

The original artist, Larry Elmore, says otherwise. (Update—the linked post has since been edited).

It's a man!

Gary didn't know what he wanted, all he wanted was something simple that would jump out at you. He wanted a male warrior. If it was a woman, you would know it for I'm pretty famous for painting women.

There was never a question in all these years about the male warrior.

No one thought it was a female warrior. "Whoever thought it was a female warrior is quite crazy and do not know what they are talking about."

This is stupid. I painted it, I should know.
- Larry Elmore​

Whether or not Elmore's intent was for the character to be a man, it seems that officially she's a woman. Either way, it's an awesome miniature. And for those who love the art, you can buy a print from Larry Elmore's official website.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad





I don't think I'd ever actually seen the immortals one before...

It's funny reading that thread where Elmore imagined it was the same character throughout (although apparently he dyes his hair different colors as he levels up), that TSR used the Companion set artwork on a novel to depict... a woman.


32 years ago, TSR was already re-imagining this character as a woman without an uproar. ;)
 

Dire Bare

Legend
32 years ago, TSR was already re-imagining this character as a woman without an uproar. ;)
True, but . . . The Tainted Sword wasn't one of the better D&D novels of the time, and many of us hardcore fans were tired of TSR using recycled art. The cover for this novel was more about re-using art TSR already owned to save a buck without trying very hard to match it to the story. This wasn't TSR boldly or cleverly reimagining a classic piece of D&D art. And . . . the internet wasn't quite the thing it is today back then.

But yeah, I agree, it is kinda funny.
 

Cadence

Legend
Supporter
Has the page with this thread always had a far right column of "related articles" that makes the main thread body narrower? (I just noticed it switching from another one that didn't have it).

1715204013581.png
 

Dragonhelm

Knight of Solamnia
It's Schrödinger's warrior. You won't know if it's male or female until you open the red box. ;)

Okay, this is just my take, but here goes.

Elmore knows what he painted, and that's fine. It would be common in that era for male characters to be rushing into action and female characters to be scantily clad.

That being said, the female warrior is just another take on the character. The mini looks pretty bad-ass, IMO.

So the fans of the original still have that, the mini fans have their take, and some of us like both interpretations. I see no need for any controversy.
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top