WOIN Capping Your Dice Pool

[TheHirumaChico]

I think your example is the rules-as-written. The pool would be 6 dice less 2 equipment dice (the -2 improv ) = 4, which is under the dice pool cap.

I'm thinking of something where Skills + Attributes + Gear = 6 or more dice on a 5 Dice Cap, and the GM allows the "excess" dice to go somewhere else. For example, 7 dice pool before Dice Cap, and allowing the 2 Attack Dice (otherwise lost by the Dice Cap) to provide +1d damage if the attack roll is successful. They still are only rolling 5 dice to hit, but feel a benefit of the "lost dice" on attack.

This doesn't answer your question, but I would note that according to the official Errata, attack dice can now be traded for damage dice at a 1:1 ratio instead of 2:1.

In my game, I do not allow dice in excess of the cap to be spent on damage or other buffs/exploits. I think the point of the cap is to keep PCs and their opponents roughly on par in terms of MDP, and so allowing the over-cap dice to be repurposed would seem to violate the general intention of the MDP. That's just my interpretation, but as Morrus often says, "it's your game, do it whichever way you prefer."

 

[1000buffalo]

This doesn't answer your question, but I would note that according to the official Errata, attack dice can now be traded for damage dice at a 1:1 ration instead of 2:1.

Oh, thanks - I'd missed that!

In my game, I do not allow dice in excess of the cap to be spent on damage or other buffs/exploits. I think the point of the cap is to keep PCs and their opponents roughly on par in terms of MDP, and so allowing the over-cap dice to be repurposed would seem to violate the general intention of the MDP. That's just my interpretation, but as Morrus often says, "it's your game, do it whichever way you prefer."

I think you're probably right re: the dice cap, but I may play with it a little. I'm not overly worried about balance.

 

[MacD]

This doesn't answer your question, but I would note that according to the official Errata, attack dice can now be traded for damage dice at a 1:1 ratio instead of 2:1.

In my game, I do not allow dice in excess of the cap to be spent on damage or other buffs/exploits. I think the point of the cap is to keep PCs and their opponents roughly on par in terms of MDP, and so allowing the over-cap dice to be repurposed would seem to violate the general intention of the MDP. That's just my interpretation, but as Morrus often says, "it's your game, do it whichever way you prefer."

Wait... Is it RAW to spend dice before capping the dice pool?

I handle spending dice as "modifiers" that apply after capping the dice pool.
Using lost dice as bonus damage would... change everything!
Equipment quality would be useful for skilled characters, for example...

Which way is the right one?

 

[Morrus]

Wait... Is it RAW to spend dice before capping the dice pool?

No.

 

[Evil_DM]

Can you clarify if the GEAR pool you describe is only the dice from the quality level of the gear (High-Quality, Exceptional, Mastercraft, etc...) or if it includes other dice that are specific to the type of item? For instance, camouflaged armor gives a +1d6 to checks to hide in appropriate terrain. Is that extra d6 part of the GEAR bucket and so subject to the cap, or is it in the "anything else" bucket that gets added after the cap?

I'm pretty sure it's not capped (or stuff like the invisibility cloak in NEW would be mostly useless), but it would be good to confirm that. Perhaps the GEAR bucket should be renamed "GEAR QUALITY" to be more specific.

As with toolkits, you could also argue that if you do not wear proper camouflage clothing, you get -1D6 or -2D6 is you try a stealth check. If you try to stealth in a business suit for example, it will give you penalties (unless you try to blend into a crowd).

A generic camouflage uniform would allow you to stealth without penalties, where a very tailored camouflage uniform (arctic camo in an arctic environment) would grant a +1D6. At least, that's how we play it.

 

[MacD]

As with toolkits, you could also argue that if you do not wear proper camouflage clothing, you get -1D6 or -2D6 is you try a stealth check. If you try to stealth in a business suit for example, it will give you penalties (unless you try to blend into a crowd).

A generic camouflage uniform would allow you to stealth without penalties, where a very tailored camouflage uniform (arctic camo in an arctic environment) would grant a +1D6. At least, that's how we play it.

So that´s how you got your name

 

[Evil_DM]

As an addendum, after playing to what I would call a fairly high level party (grade 14), we've found that Exceptional Quality Gear is not necessarily rewarding for those players who have invested in their skill.

Example in part, a good rogue'ish character with a stealth maxed (as befitting a rogue) would already roll her stealth at MDP (8D6). Once a perfectly fitting item for a rogue is found (for example, giving +2D6 bonus to stealth) we see in practice that this item goes to the none-rogue, since they benefit from it more, even though they have less affinity or investment in stealth. From a min-max perspective it is way more rewarding to create a sub-optimal character and max out by going for gear then it is to level your character fully according to your role (max ranks in attributes and relevant skill).

Other examples in the same party go for a social-skill based character (CHA 15 and all relevant skills at 6 ranks), a gunslinger (max AGI, pistols at 10 ranks), and so forth. So, any relevant treasure, instead of going to the character it fits, such as HQ clothing going to the socialite or a HQ pistol going to the gunslinger, now work as power-ups for the characters who have not maxed these skills.

With weapons you can mitigate this a bit by giving HQ+ items other bonuses, such as to damage, but basic skill increase bonuses are usually wasted on the characters they should fit best with, from a narrative point of view.

Edit: we solved this, by the way, by making a lot of weapons that are higher in damage, already the equivalent of HQ or higher and thus requiring ranks in the relevant skills. This also limits further upgrades, thereby making super-weapons fairly impossible to obtain. For example, the portable mini-gun is considered an Artisanal Quality weapon since it is hard to wield even for experienced soldiers.

 

[MacD]

As an addendum, after playing to what I would call a fairly high level party (grade 14), we've found that Exceptional Quality Gear is not necessarily rewarding for those players who have invested in their skill.

Example in part, a good rogue'ish character with a stealth maxed (as befitting a rogue) would already roll her stealth at MDP (8D6). Once a perfectly fitting item for a rogue is found (for example, giving +2D6 bonus to stealth) we see in practice that this item goes to the none-rogue, since they benefit from it more, even though they have less affinity or investment in stealth. From a min-max perspective it is way more rewarding to create a sub-optimal character and max out by going for gear then it is to level your character fully according to your role (max ranks in attributes and relevant skill).

Other examples in the same party go for a social-skill based character (CHA 15 and all relevant skills at 6 ranks), a gunslinger (max AGI, pistols at 10 ranks), and so forth. So, any relevant treasure, instead of going to the character it fits, such as HQ clothing going to the socialite or a HQ pistol going to the gunslinger, now work as power-ups for the characters who have not maxed these skills.

With weapons you can mitigate this a bit by giving HQ+ items other bonuses, such as to damage, but basic skill increase bonuses are usually wasted on the characters they should fit best with, from a narrative point of view.

Edit: we solved this, by the way, by making a lot of weapons that are higher in damage, already the equivalent of HQ or higher and thus requiring ranks in the relevant skills. This also limits further upgrades, thereby making super-weapons fairly impossible to obtain. For example, the portable mini-gun is considered an Artisanal Quality weapon since it is hard to wield even for experienced soldiers.

Hi Chris,
I agree WOIN equipment boni rules are a bit weird; some aspects of the game feel made for low grade parties only (like character sheets doesn't contain much room for additional grade features...).

RAW you get two ways to reach your MDP - maxing attribute / skill (like every rpg) or learning broader skills and max out with gear.

In my current campaign (OLD high fantasy, grade 9) I add equipment boni after capping for MDP. Of course my players like it and I have to adjust enemy hp.
I also use quality like you, some trade lists don't contain "normal" or "high" quality items as they have their standarts (like my dwarven armorsmith guild the party sometimes work for). Also a Katana should never be less than mastercraft

 

[rasktril]

In the rule book, when the pc (Sir Mandallan) makes an attack, receives 5d6 ((str 3d6 + swords 3d6) minus 1d6 because of cap). Picks up an exceptional sword (+1D6) and magical (+1d6) receives zero benefit. Or are the magical properties (+1d6) after the cap?

 

[MacD]

In the rule book, when the pc (Sir Mandallan) makes an attack, receives 5d6 ((str 3d6 + swords 3d6) minus 1d6 because of cap). Picks up an exceptional sword (+1D6) and magical (+1d6) receives zero benefit. Or are the magical properties (+1d6) after the cap?

I don't remember any magical item enhancement that adds to attack pools, but yes, boni from magic are added after capping the pool.

With WOIN, most the time you won't benefit from high quality items if your character is too specialized.
You get two options - build a broad character with hobby and knowledge skills or specialize to the point your sword skills are honed enough to fight with an ordinary stick without loss of performance.