trappedslider
Legend
Two votes for an outright ban....
Two votes for an outright ban....
My work ethic, all along, has been that my goal is to both create processes and train users in such a way to make myself redundant, for current issues, because new issues always arise. Now I'm just hoping to make it a few more years before I choose to retire.I was meeting with one of my companies partners last week, and we were having a discussion around the incorporation of AI into our business model. Discussing high level some of the changes we would need to make, what we could leverage for data management and reporting, things of that nature.
We both acknowledged that its a lot like training our replacements via outsourcing that still continues to hurt NA IT departments.
There was an awkward pause while we accepted that we would be replaced before we continued our planning, because its what we are paid to do.
My work ethic, all along, has been that my goal is to both create processes and train users in such a way to make myself redundant, for current issues, because new issues always arise. Now I'm just hoping to make it a few more years before I choose to retire.
Unfortunately because you worded the poll so badly, your results are completely meaningless even as a survey of ENworld!Sicne we haven't do a general AI thread or a poll, i thought i'd ask the question/
Something that has never been an option for the vast majority of people under 40 today, and not for a lot of people under 50, if they ever went through periods of precarity. You really need a situation where you outright own a house/flat to make that approach even potentially viable.The writing has been on the wall long enough, that I've been in 'max save, prepare for being made redundant' for 15+ years.
The news which you seem to be unware of is that courts ruled that AI art can't be copy righted.Unfortunately because you worded the poll so badly, your results are completely meaningless even as a survey of ENworld!
Personally, I'd suggest that "public domain" is a dangerously nebulous concept, so for-profit AI should not really be allowed to train on that. Particularly because of the "tragedy of the commons" issue, which you seem to be unaware of. If AI can be used for a profit, especially AI art/writing can be copyrighted,
No, I'm well aware that it currently cannot, but that ruling was at a district level, and unfortunately isn't the end of the process.The news which you seem to be unware of is that courts ruled that AI art can't be copy righted.
Something that has never been an option for the vast majority of people under 40 today, and not for a lot of people under 50, if they ever went through periods of precarity. You really need a situation where you outright own a house/flat to make that approach even potentially viable