See, for me, as a fan of the picture, I’m encouraged by this. I Always like taking old things and looking at them in new way. That’s a huge fun of D&D for me.
I do want to be clear that I do not care whether is a man or a woman. I grew up thinking it was a man, and I’m fine now thinking of it as a woman. And I’m also fine with still thinking it is a man!
I mean, when we are talking about “magic” is there any real difference between gaming and simulation? I mean magic exists just for the game, it can’t really simulate anything
That order makes the most sense of anything proposed. Like @Henadic Theologian said, it isn’t a precise science, but this classification is at least logical!
Sure, but you’re fighting against simple math which seems a bit silly to me. It is a bit like calling Tom Cruise the tallest movie star when the Rock is standing right next to him.
I don’t know how you can possibly justify that; however, if that is true, how do you justify the 2024 rules changes only bring half as important than Tasha’s
Yet I’ve played 5e since about 2 months after launch and never stepped foot in the realms.
Adventures , IMO & IME don’t make something default - core books do.
I have more people talk about it being the example setting in the DMG, that does not make it the default setting. I imagine that will continue to be the multiverse as it has been for this edition