I don't mean to dismiss Radiant Citadel (especially as i don't own it) but when I say "setting" I personally mean a big book like the FRCS or Rising from the Last War or similar.
Gawds I hated Taladas...
I don't know how differently i can say it: as a lifelong fan of D&D, I LIKE it when there is something official from D&D that gets me excited. That is the whole motivation.
I don't care for campaign length adventures or splatbooks, so there isn't much else WotC could put out besides a setting that WOULD excite me. I suppose a really cool focused monster book like Fizban's (maybe for the fae, or perhaps demons and devils) might get me going. But remember this thread...
I linked the definition -- and you quoted that post where I linked it. "Had no idea" feels a little bit disingenuous since we know you at least acknowledged the definition, but chose to ignore it in order to continue an argument only you were having. Even after I defined it for you multiple...
That seems extra silly considering those actors are 25 odd years older than when those movies were filmed. Just do it as a sequel.
I will never understand the need to constantly return to the same well over and over. but we have talked about this with regards to D&D settings, so...