Ignore it all you like, it's what the rules say. It's called context. It helps if you can recognize it.
"you typically show no signs of injury. When you drop below half your hit point maximum , you show signs of wear"
Context is your friend. You can play internet lawyer with your "Aha! I...
First off, I said that I said it twice and wouldn't say it a third time. Second, in the first quote I mentioned stingers and shouldn't have had to mention it again. Just quoting the actual quote says EXACTLY what he asked for. A reason why stingers worked. If he can't be bothered to try and...
Twice I've quoted where it says very clearly that typically you show no signs before 50%. That's there so that stingers and such will still inflict poison, which I stated straight out the first time I quoted it.
It says PCs get the same traits as the rest of the race, not that they get different traits. NPCs and PCs are both part of the same race, so they all get the same traits. While NPCs and PCs don't follow the same set-up for creation, they still follow the same rules for racial abilities. An...
Provide me a citation saying "ECMO3 is right" and I will concede. :rolleyes:
What I provided was sufficient. I'm not going to play your silly game of finding the exact wording you choose to put down or else you're right.
This is what I mean by you just reading to argue and not understand. And I quote..........................again!
"you show signs of wear, such as cuts and bruises."
Do you understand what "such as" means?
And I quote.......................again!
"An attack that reduces you to 0 hit points...
The mind flayer would cause no physical damage. The dragon will not even hit the PC until half hit points or lower, and won't directly strike until 0. Same with guiding bolt. It misses until half hit points, doing luck/skill/etc. damage, then causes minor things until 0.
I quoted it. Don't...
Riiiiiiight, you're bloodied(cut), but not bloodied. :rolleyes:
Give me a break. Do you have a real counterargument?
I quoted how and said how. But since you're reading to argue and not to understand, you of course "missed" it.
Nothing there contradicts me dude. Trying reading to understand and not just to argue.
As for the bloodied condition, did you not see the part in 5e where you show cuts and bruises at half hit points. That's blooded. 🤦♂️
PS You just disproved your own argument there. If you aren't...