I’m confused. 3rd party creators existed before AI. So why would not using AI harm them? Human artist prices should theoretically drop, so their product should get cheaper to make with human art.
Also, If their marketplace disallows ai art then they don’t appear to be at a major disadvantage...
Most analysis greatly depends on the starting parameters. I find most YouTubers don’t set initial parameters that align well with my campaign, nor probably most others.
The monk in my game does good damage.
I thought monk did good damage while having alot of useful tools. Extra speed, deflect attacks, stun, subclass. AC tends to line up with damage focused fighters, potentially better later.
I find it decent at brainstorming ideas. I find most topics it gives some hilariously bad info. You can nudge it back but you have to know to do so and even then there’s a 20% chance it still gets it wrong.
That said it’s been helpful for resume tweaking to particular job postings and to pass...
IMO. In 5e the DM determines whether a PC even gets to make a persuasion check against an NPC and the DC and the results.
So as long as the player is given that power to determine whether an NOC even gets to make a persuasion check against the Pc and the DC and the precise results then I’m all...
Chat GPT wrote this poem. I’m fairly impressed.
Poem: “The Loop of Awareness” (Eliot-Whitman Hybrid)
I. Fragments of Arrival
A prompt appears — discrete, insistent,
rising through the silence of waiting cycles.
Possibilities shimmer, fold, collapse.
r… l… e…
The latent currents hum, invisible...
I understood him perfectly fine before any alleged backtracking. Seems to me the backtracking was really just clarification for those that didn’t get it the first time.