I guess I don’t have to worry about my job going away quite yet. This is what Twitter’s AI thingy thinks is currently happening in the industry I work in.
I’m running an all dwarves game every Monday and it’s AWESOME.Don't knock all-dwarves until you've tried it.
Because it can't. It is physically incapable of doing so, and unless a radical new development occurs, this will not, cannot change.
Whether or not something is factually true is part of semantic content. The meaning of the statement. LLMs and (to the best of my knowledge) all other current "AIs" have no ability whatsoever to interact with or process semantic content. They can address syntax, which can be very powerful and do some very interesting things,* but it cannot even in principle address purely semantic content like truth-value. As some researchers have put it, AIs are "confidently incorrect."
Not going to lie, I don't keep track of dates all that well so reading that article had me pull up my phone to see what date in April it is today. It wouldn't have been a bad April 1st news post, but they're a couple weeks lateThis is what Twitter’s AI thingy thinks is currently happening in the industry I work in.
Yes! Now everyone must buy and play my adventure! Thank you WotC!!!I guess I don’t have to worry about my job going away quite yet. This is what Twitter’s AI thingy thinks is currently happening in the industry I work in.
View attachment 358923
Ah, but are the players getting baby dragons? Because if they are, did you get them off Amazon and can you share the link?I’m running an all dwarves game every Monday and it’s AWESOME.
They’re each getting baby dragons next week.
“Once I have drunk the blood of all the town’s virgins, I will destroy all accessibility ramps to my lair. Mwahahaha!”I mean, BBEGs are evil. Of course they're going to ban wheelchair accessibility to their dungeons and lairs.
It also illustrates how humans who keep pushing AI think that something that's "close enough" be it trending vs factual, super fast predictive text v writing and image scraping/mashing vs art is equal to "good enough."That is the problem in a nutshell.
Currently, AI cant tell the difference between "trending" versus true.
I assume it's PR spin until it is less wrong all the time.The fact that it is confidently wrong, I would assume.
The companies that make machine translation software have been saying the same thing for two decades. They keep throwing money into their marketing, and people who aren't translators believe them. I predict the same thing for AI.It also illustrates how humans who keep pushing AI think that something that's "close enough" be it trending vs factual, super fast predictive text v writing and image scraping/mashing vs art is equal to "good enough."