It is still the derpiest of dragons.
What are you talking about? IIRC it wasn't even a "stat" for Dragons, dump or otherwise...It's 1e. Charisma was a dump stat even for Dragons.
Oh, is that a red wyrm? I thought it was an "apocalypse dragon," given the like...molten-lava-and-rocks look.Post #2 of this very thread.
I think it's neat. Dragons should be destroying cities.I'm still mad no one wants to.talk about the absolutely gorgeous city buster apocalypse red wyrm.
I like this much more than the silver dragon. FWIW, I don't think AI has anything to do with it. I reckon some of the figures in the foreground of the dragon pic just aren't very well done. Anyone remember the 5e halfling?For context of Campbell White's styles and capabilities, here is a piece from 6 years ago which cannot have any AI component, as the tech didn'texiat at the time:
View attachment 353609
I have a feeling that most prudent artists are going to meticulously save their drafts (and many obviously already have been) just to stop this sort of (usually unfounded) accusation. At this point, such accusations without something very obviously wrong are just demeaning hard-working artists.OK, so the artist already addressed the AI question on Twitter, and shared some of the rough draft versions (below). Apparently he did 10, one for each Dragon type, and the city here is just one made up to showcase a Silver Dragon doing their thing.
View attachment 353622View attachment 353623View attachment 353624View attachment 353625View attachment 353626
x.com
x.com
It's becoming the boy who cried wolf, for sure. By pulling a hair trigger on false positives, it only provides cover for actual commercial use of AI art, if companies think people cannot tell the difference.I have a feeling that most prudent artists are going to meticulously save their drafts (and many obviously already have been) just to stop this sort of (usually unfounded) accusation. At this point, such accusations without something very obviously wrong are just demeaning hard-working artists.