Some people have an inherent bias towards 5E that, while maybe sometimes true at their tables, is often pretended to be objective reality, such as 5E is too easy for players. I tend to find these people opt out of using mechanics without trying them because they assume an absolute understanding of something they blatantly do not understand absolutely (a claim that few could ever earnestly make, if any).
You have an avatar now, what the?!!?
I shamed myself into a paid membership.
Shoulda just paid for mine instead smh
Im looking for fairness and whim of the dice. Plus 5E already gives the players much better the average chances to do the things they are skilled at.
Metacurrency like Inspiration or Luck isn't really pointed at making things easier, it is pointed at giving the players some control over the outcome.
I'd rather have Legendary Actions than Inspiration, personally. ^-^
That doesn't mean a mechanic like luck doesn't increase the chances of success.
Of course it does. That's how the player gets a say in the outcome of an event they really want to have happen. That's different than it being a method to "make the game even easier."
I am planning to offer monster advantage on saves so it's not automatic. Just reflects are hardy creature of legendary proportions. can have a round limit as desired but players won't feel so defeated knowing they have to "waste" save type attacks.
