Who else wants damage tracked separately per hit ?

[frankthedm]

I'm a big fan of tracking damage per hit if it lets mundane healing skills repair a small amount of damage per hit. Sure it takes a bit more room on the sheet, but by keeping them separate, non magical healing can be made to matter by allowing each wound to be healed a few HP, with magical healing being saved for emergencies.

 

[ExploderWizard]

For D&D no thanks. Perhaps for a game where specific wounds meant something. All damage is abstract and goes into the same HP pool and no one suffers any ill effects until 0 HP.

I don't see how tracking separate wounds adds anything but extra record keeping.

 

[Knight Templar]

I'd love it, but it'll never ever happen.

 

[Piratecat]

I would hate this. Not for me, thanks.

 

[Leatherhead]

It takes way to long to heal something the mundane way. I play D&D as an adventurer, not a patient (that's best saved for horror games).

 

[Scribble]

I would also hate this. Sorry.

 

[Grazzt]

For D&D, no thanks

 

[Infiniti2000]

I don't think it would play all that well. At some point you'd be tempted to classify specific injuries as large or small, and then all "meaning" here would be lost.

 

[Umbran]

This smacks of too much fiddly-bit tracking for me.

 

[Arytiss]

As others have said, not for D&D. While I don't mind this sort of system, I suspect it would get in the way when I'm playing. I'll leave it for Riddle of Steel and the other semi-realistic combat systems. D&D I just want to be able to sit down and roll some dice with my friends.