Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Vote Up A 5e-alike, Part 4 - Skills
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 9164295" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>That's pretty much what I meant when I was saying background/culture/class skills.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I doubt this is going to go to roll-under; most people prefer the roll-above.</p><p></p><p>But the problem with the "life skills" is that there are <em>so many </em>possibilities, and many of them are not actually universal. Swimming and boating are basic life skills if you live near water (not useful for your desert-born PC). Riding is a basic life skill if you live in a place where mounts are common and affordable (not useful for your mountain-born PC, or your dead-broke peasant PC). This is why I would go for a Culture skill instead.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I just don't think most people are all that happy with their character being made by random rolls. Most people don't even like rolling for stats these days.</p><p></p><p>In my own games, we just let the PCs decide if their characters have a clue. A person who has proficiency in Water Vehicles obviously <em>knows </em>how to use a boat and can do so well, but someone who has said that their character grew up near the ocean can say that sure, they know enough about boats to at least use the Help action with the person who actually has the proficiency. Mind, the players at my table rarely try to game the system and often enjoy saying that their PCs are actually incompetant at something.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah, it's just what you're used to so it's become natural to you. I've played both roll-under (AD&D, GURPS, CoC) and roll-above (just about everything else), and neither is more elegant than the other. It's just that roll-above is invariably faster and easier, which is really useful most of the time. If you want <em>elegance, </em>you want something that allows for degrees of success and failure--succeed or fail by X amount in addition to regular and critical successes and failures. This <em>could </em>be done in a D&D-alike. Level Up uses the idea for their exploration challenges. It might also help with that martial/caster divide. If you have fail, near miss, success, great success, then a fighter or other warrior might be able to inflict minimal damage or have some other effect on a near miss while a rogue or caster wouldn't. You still get that enhanced narrative, because missing by 1 or 2 isn't the same as missing by 5 or 10.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I wouldn't mind that either, with the skills also being tied to background and culture as well as class. It's easy all around and only requires a brief bullet list in each background/culture/class that explains what the skill is used for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 9164295, member: 6915329"] That's pretty much what I meant when I was saying background/culture/class skills. Well, I doubt this is going to go to roll-under; most people prefer the roll-above. But the problem with the "life skills" is that there are [I]so many [/I]possibilities, and many of them are not actually universal. Swimming and boating are basic life skills if you live near water (not useful for your desert-born PC). Riding is a basic life skill if you live in a place where mounts are common and affordable (not useful for your mountain-born PC, or your dead-broke peasant PC). This is why I would go for a Culture skill instead. Yeah, I just don't think most people are all that happy with their character being made by random rolls. Most people don't even like rolling for stats these days. In my own games, we just let the PCs decide if their characters have a clue. A person who has proficiency in Water Vehicles obviously [I]knows [/I]how to use a boat and can do so well, but someone who has said that their character grew up near the ocean can say that sure, they know enough about boats to at least use the Help action with the person who actually has the proficiency. Mind, the players at my table rarely try to game the system and often enjoy saying that their PCs are actually incompetant at something. Nah, it's just what you're used to so it's become natural to you. I've played both roll-under (AD&D, GURPS, CoC) and roll-above (just about everything else), and neither is more elegant than the other. It's just that roll-above is invariably faster and easier, which is really useful most of the time. If you want [I]elegance, [/I]you want something that allows for degrees of success and failure--succeed or fail by X amount in addition to regular and critical successes and failures. This [I]could [/I]be done in a D&D-alike. Level Up uses the idea for their exploration challenges. It might also help with that martial/caster divide. If you have fail, near miss, success, great success, then a fighter or other warrior might be able to inflict minimal damage or have some other effect on a near miss while a rogue or caster wouldn't. You still get that enhanced narrative, because missing by 1 or 2 isn't the same as missing by 5 or 10. I wouldn't mind that either, with the skills also being tied to background and culture as well as class. It's easy all around and only requires a brief bullet list in each background/culture/class that explains what the skill is used for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Vote Up A 5e-alike, Part 4 - Skills
Top