erik_the_guy
First Post
As I understand it, versatile weapons add +1 to damage when used two handed, and two handed weapons do not gain any such bonus. In this case the bastard sword is a better two handed weapon than a great sword.
Bastard sword 2 handed: 1d10 + 1
Great sword 2 handed: 1d10
I understand that the bastard sword is a superior weapon, therefore it should be better, but bastard swords have always been the weapon a bit bigger than a longsword and smaller than a greatsword that could be used with the proper feat. In fact a longsword does about the same as the greatsword two handed (1d8+1 and 1d10, same average damage). The greatsword only deals more with powers that use 2[W] or greater since they do not multiply the +1.
Am I missing something? Maybe it would make sense if all two handed weapons benefited from the +1 damage feature.
Bastard sword 2 handed: 1d10 + 1
Great sword 2 handed: 1d10
I understand that the bastard sword is a superior weapon, therefore it should be better, but bastard swords have always been the weapon a bit bigger than a longsword and smaller than a greatsword that could be used with the proper feat. In fact a longsword does about the same as the greatsword two handed (1d8+1 and 1d10, same average damage). The greatsword only deals more with powers that use 2[W] or greater since they do not multiply the +1.
Am I missing something? Maybe it would make sense if all two handed weapons benefited from the +1 damage feature.