Creamsteak
Explorer
If you have EVER played a monk, then you can understand my opinion. Every other class that is expected to perform in melee combat at least sparcely during thier career -has at least a d8 for a hit die.
The psionic warrior isn't that far from a Monk if played a certain way. They have a d8.
Clerics, of all things, have a d8 hit die. They can cast miracle at some point. Why would a monk have a lower hit die? Wouldn't a monastic lawful neutral religions monks be expected to defend the clerics?
Sorcerers have the same hit die as a Monk. How many sorcerer's are expected to fight at close quarters?
The Monk gets some ranged weapons, but the monk doesn't get improved abilities with any ranged weapons.
So why then would a DM I know force Monks to play with a d6 hit die, claiming that Monk's get more class abilities and are broken?
The psionic warrior isn't that far from a Monk if played a certain way. They have a d8.
Clerics, of all things, have a d8 hit die. They can cast miracle at some point. Why would a monk have a lower hit die? Wouldn't a monastic lawful neutral religions monks be expected to defend the clerics?
Sorcerers have the same hit die as a Monk. How many sorcerer's are expected to fight at close quarters?
The Monk gets some ranged weapons, but the monk doesn't get improved abilities with any ranged weapons.
So why then would a DM I know force Monks to play with a d6 hit die, claiming that Monk's get more class abilities and are broken?