D&D (2024) Taking a healing potion as a bonus action?


log in or register to remove this ad


This has to be one of the most common house rules in 5e: you can use a healing potion on yourself as a bonus action (it's still an action to use on someone else). Should it just be made canon?
No thanks.

Using a potion, even a healing potion, should cost an action. The whole "bonus action healing potion" is yet another common house rule that only serves to make 5e easier.

5e does NOT need anything to make it easier.
 


I don't see this as about ease, I see it as about fun. Using your action to drink a potion is not fun. A side bonus of this house rule is that it makes it much, much more likely for players to use healing potions, which is a great gold sink.

My perspective is: if almost everyone is doing it anyway, doesn't that imply it should just be a rule? Kinda like natural 1s being automatic failures.
 




We allow you to consume a potion yourself as a bonus action, but require an action to administer to someone else.

I'm actually not sure whether I like that as a standard rule - I'm inclined instead to suggest that healing potions should be more powerful across the board, but require an action to use. But as they stand, it's really hard to justify burning a whole action for an average of 7 hp healing.
 


Trending content

Remove ads

Top