Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
NPC interactions with the environment or other NPC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6268756" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Well I think the Numenera corebook addresses this in a couple of ways (...and remember this is only for actions where the NPC's are not opposing the PC's in some way since they would otherwise be using their level) but then leaves the desired implementation up to the GM...</p><p></p><p>The first way is for the GM to just decide success or failure for an NPC based on his own desires, flow of the game, etc. This is the simplest method and I would use this for unimportant/irrelevant/scene dressing NPC's as well as for things that happen "off-screen" or outside the influence of the PC's and have no direct effect on them. </p><p></p><p>Another method touched on in the book is for the NPC's level to be assessed and compared with the level of what he or she is trying to accomplish and they either succeed because they have a higher level than the challenge or fail because they have a lower level than the challenge. I'd probably use this method for minor NPC's since it would allow them to tackle somethings when working with the PC's but still leave the major stuff for the PC's to handle.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another (and I believe final method, though I could be wrong) is suggested for NPC vs. NPC (but I plan to use it in a more widespread way for Major NPC's). This method is for the NPC's to be treated like a player with rolls, etc. This method, IMO, is a little imprecise since PC's and NPC's don't work on the same system, and NPC's don't have the stats (training, specializations, etc.) that are used in rolls. The book is kind of vague on how to address the fact that most NPC's only have a level. </p><p></p><p>I've been thinking about refining and adding to this by deciding that, when using this method, an NPC's level is subtracted from the difficulty level of a particular task before rolling to succeed or fail. So if the level of a task is 3 and a level 1 NPC is attempting it... it would be a level 2 task, roll over 6 while a level 3 NPC would automatically succeed. This modification draws heavily from the second method (but instead of making it an absolute pass/fail instead gives a chance for the NPC to succeed even at difficulties of a higher level). This is just something I thought of while reading the book and I would still need to see how it is in actual play but I think it should work pretty well since NPC's can't use effort... though I'm not sure if I would allow them to use assets such as tools (though I'm leaning towards yes).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 6268756, member: 48965"] Well I think the Numenera corebook addresses this in a couple of ways (...and remember this is only for actions where the NPC's are not opposing the PC's in some way since they would otherwise be using their level) but then leaves the desired implementation up to the GM... The first way is for the GM to just decide success or failure for an NPC based on his own desires, flow of the game, etc. This is the simplest method and I would use this for unimportant/irrelevant/scene dressing NPC's as well as for things that happen "off-screen" or outside the influence of the PC's and have no direct effect on them. Another method touched on in the book is for the NPC's level to be assessed and compared with the level of what he or she is trying to accomplish and they either succeed because they have a higher level than the challenge or fail because they have a lower level than the challenge. I'd probably use this method for minor NPC's since it would allow them to tackle somethings when working with the PC's but still leave the major stuff for the PC's to handle. Another (and I believe final method, though I could be wrong) is suggested for NPC vs. NPC (but I plan to use it in a more widespread way for Major NPC's). This method is for the NPC's to be treated like a player with rolls, etc. This method, IMO, is a little imprecise since PC's and NPC's don't work on the same system, and NPC's don't have the stats (training, specializations, etc.) that are used in rolls. The book is kind of vague on how to address the fact that most NPC's only have a level. I've been thinking about refining and adding to this by deciding that, when using this method, an NPC's level is subtracted from the difficulty level of a particular task before rolling to succeed or fail. So if the level of a task is 3 and a level 1 NPC is attempting it... it would be a level 2 task, roll over 6 while a level 3 NPC would automatically succeed. This modification draws heavily from the second method (but instead of making it an absolute pass/fail instead gives a chance for the NPC to succeed even at difficulties of a higher level). This is just something I thought of while reading the book and I would still need to see how it is in actual play but I think it should work pretty well since NPC's can't use effort... though I'm not sure if I would allow them to use assets such as tools (though I'm leaning towards yes). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
NPC interactions with the environment or other NPC
Top