doctorhook
Legend
With the "noble" background, a character can move through high society with relative impunity compared to non-noble characters. That said, in feudal societies noble children were often strategically pushed into certain vocations such as soldiery or priesthood (or even scientific pursuits in Victorian times). Even today, Princes William and Harry served in the military.
In a typical D&D setting, it's reasonable that highborn children might end up in a vocation that also has a background, and yet would still be fully privileged and socialized to participate in noble society. If young Lord Bartholomew of House Simpson (heir to the Evergreen Terraces) is a trained soldier in the royal army, he's probably at home among nobility and among rank and file troops. Should he have the noble background or the soldier background? Why?
The same question works with the commoner background--and probably others--as well. Some of the backgrounds are not the least bit exclusionary to others. In cases like these, what approach would you take to for selecting a background?
I'd like to hear your thoughts.
In a typical D&D setting, it's reasonable that highborn children might end up in a vocation that also has a background, and yet would still be fully privileged and socialized to participate in noble society. If young Lord Bartholomew of House Simpson (heir to the Evergreen Terraces) is a trained soldier in the royal army, he's probably at home among nobility and among rank and file troops. Should he have the noble background or the soldier background? Why?
The same question works with the commoner background--and probably others--as well. Some of the backgrounds are not the least bit exclusionary to others. In cases like these, what approach would you take to for selecting a background?
I'd like to hear your thoughts.