The main problem you have here is.... you didn't make a Tanuki.
Tanuki are a real animal. It is an animal that doesn't climb, it is a burrower. It is pretty slow and clumsy as far as a predator goes. The folktales about Tanuki generally paint them to being pretty dim, wild, awkward and generally funny. Their most commonly cited traits are transforming themselves into objects by putting leafs on their heads and that they have giant inflatable, stretchable scrotums that they can use in a variety of ways such as drums, balloons, blankets, baskets, etc. Neither of which seems to fit the "minor illusion" power you put here.
First of all thank you for the in-depth consideration and feedback!

I can't say I agree with you that I did not make tanuki, but I will agree that I did not make
your vision of tanuki and should you run some D&D in
Mists of Akuma, I encourage you to modify them however you see fit to.

While there is absolutely a creature in the real world known as tanuki (that is to say, a
Japanese raccoon dog), they have a strong popularity in Japanese mythology that has little to do with the actual animal -- it's not a disparity as big as Babe the Blue Ox, but obviously like any lore they have traits that the real animal does not (exaggerating many that they do have, like enlarged scrotums).
As I put this together, I read several websites to make sure I remained true to their mythology. Your assertion that tanuki are dim-witted might be true in some instances, but the most popular tanuki characters in folklore were famed for being clever and tricking others (see
danzaborou-danuki, a sort of ghost tanuki popular in Japanese mythology). Danzaburou was well known for being a tricky character, one that used illusions (thus the
minor illusion cantrip). In terms of burrowing vs. climbing, if you check out their
mythologies by area you'll find two tanuki that were definitely climbers, so again I'm going to stick to my guns on that too.
Though they have tails, their tails are neither large enough nor flexible enough to make them any more worth mentioning than the Tieflings tail is. I don't imagine every race that has a tail needs it to have this particular trait.
I agree that not every race requires a trait to cover their tails, but I would argue that tails are far more important to tanuki in comparison to tieflings. One of their tenets is "
a big tail that provides steadiness and strength until success is achieved" and to translate that into mechanics, I thought something about tricky communication (strengthening the theme I've set up with
minor illusion) was appropriate.
I guess you could call the animal brave, although most tanuki myths involved them hiding from people using their magic because they get spooked so easily... affable, careless and generally relaxed would be better descriptive. And certainly nothing about their tails would make them out to be thieves. Beggars, perhaps, but not clever and deceptive thieves.
I don't disagree with that, but the thievery bit has to do with their subjugation in the recent past of Soburin (the last 150 years or so) and less to do with the original mythology that inspires this race. However, one of my team pointed out that they were a
little too good so we dropped the bravery trait this morning.
It feels like you saw they looked like Racoons and just assumed that everything about them must be exactly like the American image of a raccoon. But you couldn't be further off. They would be more comparable to a coyote or a badger. I really think you should spend more time figuring out what Tanukis are about and then give this another go.
As a fellow with a minor in mythology I am a little bit hurt that you feel this way, but can only politely disagree and assure you that I definitely did due diligence while researching for the tanuki race. If I were just making straight up raccoon people (which might be worth pursuing) we'd be looking at something far, far more stealthy, although I cannot deny that they got a bit of treatment like that due to the century and a half of subjugation they've experienced in
Mists of Akuma (though obviously you have no way of knowing that from this small one page preview

.)
But, as far as these stats go?... Hmmm....
Well, what I would suggest is that you put them aside. Are these going to be part of an east Asian themed world where you are going to have Kitsune and turtle-like Kappa and bird-headed Tengu and maybe Panda-folk and other "furries" for lack of a better term?
Here's the full list of race options in
Mists of Akuma: Humans (Soburi, Ceramian, and Ropaeo), Bakemono, Enjin, Hengeyokai (of the Cat, Dog, Monkey, Rat, Crane, Fox, and Spider varieties), Kappa, Mutants, Necroji, Oni-Touched, Psonorous, Pyon, Shikome, Steametic, Tanuki, Tengu, Umibozu.
Because these would be fine for Raccoon folk OR, if you want to keep with the east asian theme, a race based on Red Panda. You could call them "Habre" or "Kaala" which are local Nepalese names for the animal and the only names for it that aren't multi-word terms calling them "bear cats" or "little red bears" or "little pandas". Because that animal does do a lot of climbing, does live in trees, does have a large tail, is dexterous and clever and could easily be envisioned as thieves.... though the brave part doesn't work as being things that are hunted by leopards, weasels and humans tend to be panicky and run away up the trees at the first sign of trouble.
But for proper Tanuki, think more a slow, prodding people that pretty much get along with everyone everywhere, have few cares in the world, love to indulge but are otherwise pretty common folk... focus on Constitution, Charisma, possibly maybe Wisdom or Strength. Make sure you hit on the "they can disguise themselves as objects, but they can't move or do anything else when they do so" and having a big flap of stretchable, inflatable skin that they can use in creative ways even if you don't feel comfortable explaining what skin that is... basically... make them tanuki, not Halfling/Gnomes.
I like my tanuki and don't want to swap them for an obscure thing without mythological precedent -- I remember seeing red pandas at the zoo, but can't recall hearing any lore about them (though if you want to pitch me a red panda race for MoA, you are encouraged to do so!)
If you check out the links above you can see my reasoning for some of the traits you didn't feel are appropriate but as a point of fact, we have a Japanese scholar (a fellow who teaches mythology on the mainland even!) ready to evaluate the full
Mists of Akuma book before it is published to make sure that we stay on point. I'll make sure that he gets a look at this thread so he can consider your thoughtful critique when it comes to the tanuki!
Thank you again for the feedback! While I can't say it compelled me to change a lot about the race, it is definitely good food for thought and I appreciate that you took the time to share your opinions.
