I have seen alot of "look at my sick build" threads where there is a claim that a Teifling with the Hellfire blood feat geats a bonus with a flaming weapon. I read the description of the feat and the weapon.
The feat sais
"You gain a +1 feat bonus to attack rolls and damage rolls when you use a power that has the fire or fear keyword."
The weapon description sais
"Power (At-Will ✦ Fire): Free Action. All damage dealt by this weapon is fire damage. Another free action returns the damage to normal."
So the weapon allows you to convert damage to fire. Great. What missing here is that the weapon does NOT say that it lends the fire keyword to the power, it sais it converts damage. So (VERY) technically this alleged synergy between Hellfire blood and Flaming weapon is specious, because the power has to have the fire keyword, which (unless it had it in the first place) it wont simply for using a flaming weapon.
Of course this might just be splitting hairs, but I get concerned that the designers put in a feat with one intention, and weapon with another, and the "power builders" out there have taken to it, mis-interpreted and are building on the basis.
Has this been previously qualified? Am I over-analysing? Opinions?
(One further qualification : I know the power of the weapon itself has the fire keyword, but Im talking about the other powers that are used)
The feat sais
"You gain a +1 feat bonus to attack rolls and damage rolls when you use a power that has the fire or fear keyword."
The weapon description sais
"Power (At-Will ✦ Fire): Free Action. All damage dealt by this weapon is fire damage. Another free action returns the damage to normal."
So the weapon allows you to convert damage to fire. Great. What missing here is that the weapon does NOT say that it lends the fire keyword to the power, it sais it converts damage. So (VERY) technically this alleged synergy between Hellfire blood and Flaming weapon is specious, because the power has to have the fire keyword, which (unless it had it in the first place) it wont simply for using a flaming weapon.
Of course this might just be splitting hairs, but I get concerned that the designers put in a feat with one intention, and weapon with another, and the "power builders" out there have taken to it, mis-interpreted and are building on the basis.
Has this been previously qualified? Am I over-analysing? Opinions?
(One further qualification : I know the power of the weapon itself has the fire keyword, but Im talking about the other powers that are used)