kenobi65 said:You betcha they'd stack; as Trainz points out, they're all different effects.
The mirror images remain close to the caster and each other, so they'd blink with the caster.
I'd probably rule that only the caster (not his images) is under the effect of the displacement, however.
KarinsDad said:PS. Blinking and Displacement stack (i.e. you make two miss chance rolls) if your opponent cannot strike ethereal since one is a miss chance (due to you possibly being on the etheral plane) and one is a miss chance due to concealment. If your opponent can strike ethereal, then only the Displacement miss chance occurs due to both of them being miss chances due to concealment (i.e. they do not stack in this case).
SRD said:If the attack is capable of striking ethereal creatures, the miss chance is only 20% (for concealment). If the attacker can see invisible creatures, the miss chance is also only 20%. (For an attacker who can both see and strike ethereal creatures, there is no miss chance.)
KarinsDad said:I don't think the targeting rules of spells support this interpretation, but other people think that the "copying of visual effects" of Mirror Image does. Effectively, they think that the images get the concealment bonus because they are blurry, not because you are under the affect of a Blur spell that gives you (and only you) that concealment bonus. YMMV.
Patryn of Elvenshae said:The counterpoint is, of course, that you have a concealment miss chance only because you are blurry.
Because your images are also blurry, they get the same miss chance.
The fact that you became blurry because of a spell targeted at you is largely irrelevant.
azmodean said:What would the effect be if a character had displacement, mirror image, and blink up at the same time? Would the images blink and/or be displaced?