Search results

don't forget five heads

for 7th and 8th level, is it meant to say 10,000 gp per level?

Maybe the "take up the target's attunement slots" thing could be a good rare variant for permanency (cursing permanency?)

maybe link it to a saving throw or something?

i'll assume the attunement slot is only "occupied" as long as the spell is in effect, and it would make sense that the target of the effect (if it positive) would be the one with the attunement slot taken (though if its something like polymorphing a frog and making it permanent, it would be the...

The intent, it seems, is for 8th level or high casting to remove a previous restriction. For the attunement thing, that's a bit more tricky but I'll assume it would be the target of the spell.

I will say i do like EvilDMGuy's idea to connect permanancy to the attunement mechanic. Makes it both reasonable and balanced with you having to pick against having permanent truesigth against a magic item.

i also point out there's even less precedent for attribute loss in A5E.

definatly not as expensive as an actual dragon, but i could see it being comparable to a wyvern.

i know dragon eggs in base a5e has an associated cost, so maybe throw in costs for drake eggs (similar, costs to have these as mounts).

i do feel like you could do an elite version of this (like a primordial earth giant, for example).

i suppose it's inspired by some symbiotic relationships ants have?

so was the ankheg symbiosis from the article or is that something you added?

it would be kinda cool if one of the Legends and Lore would be its a distant relative of the tarrasque.

keen senses should be keen sight btw.

i suppose it would make sense that if the hai-riyo is the aerial dragon turtle, it would have a titanic equivalent as a variant as well.

should this be a dragon and not a monstrosity? wyverns are dragonkin and their labeled as dragons?

technically you can just use combinations of the four alignment traits, chaotic evil, lawful good, chaotic good, and law good are alignment traits already.

also cause wounds isn't spell in a5e, but rather inflict wounds.

kinda strange you didn't give alignment traits for the Equars, as that would make sense considering the alignment thing they have.