Search results

The physical bite isn’t really what’s being judged, except in that he acts like he thinks it’s very large and it doesn’t, to my eyes, appear to be. What’s being judged is the sincerity of the gesture. In the attempt to seem like a “normal man,” he only manages to illustrate just how far removed...

Whatever you may think of the size of the burger or the bite he took out of it, he is certainly not a normal man.

Really. It’s bigger than McDonalds’ other burgers, but it’s comparable in size to like a Five Guys burger.

Just another example of the ultra wealthy having zero concept of how the working class thinks.

Oh, they don’t. The fact that they even thought that showing the CEO eating their food would make them seem relatable and therefore make people more likely to want to buy it, is just another layer in how deeply (and comically) out of touch it looked. Of course! But it deserved mocking from the...

Well, yeah. It was a bizarre choice to have him do it. The only reason to have someone in a position like that do such an ad would be to make the company look “relatable.” And they did exactly the opposite, which is hilarious.

Well, not exactly. But I can understand why he might be less sexually appealing to folks who are not into men. Cthulhu has a pretty distinct masculine energy, and you kinda gotta be up for finding out what them tentacles do.

The crying scene. So, so much snot.

Not sure if serious, but the Big Arch is a pretty normal-sized burger, at least by Ameriksland standards. Part of what was so absurd about the original video was him pretending to be intimidated by the size of this perfectly normal burger, saying “I don’t even know how to attack this” as he...

That’s alright, as long as he isn’t still with his baby mama!

Nah, that’s probably the most valid possible reason not to be interested in him lol

Who, Cthulhu? I’d question your taste if you -don’t find him hot!

I kinda hate that this is a trend. It’s funny for consumers to dunk on corpos for obviously not actually liking the product they’re trying to sell. That is not an invitation for other corpos to pretend to dunk on each other. It’s so saturated in “hello fellow kids” energy it actually makes them...

Blair Witch was kind of an unusual case, because it was one of the first really successful found footage horror movies, and one of the first movies to play with the ARG-style viral marketing campaign. As you say, horror is subjective, but a huge part of why Blair Witch had such a reputation for...

I dunno, I think becoming powerful enough to kill a god and take their place is kinda part of the tradition of D&D.

I don’t mind stats on Cthulhu. Azathoth shouldn’t have stats though.

I’d note that Personality Traits, Ideals, Bonds, and Flaws are not codified things in 5.5e, so those lines could probably be used for something else. Nice sheet though, I like how much space it gives for actually writing stuff instead of wasting a bunch of space on graphic design elements.

The difference is pretty subtle overall, but I feel like most of the player-facing rules are improved in 5.5e and most of the DM-facing rules are… side-grades.

I find levels 3-5 to be the sweet spot for 5e (either version). And I don’t want to just start in the sweet spot, because then the game can only go downhill from there. I like to have a little bit of build-up before reaching that peak, and a little wind-down after. So I tend to prefer to start...

I don’t think The VVitch ever really gets scary, though I suppose I probably would find it much scarier if I was a Puritan settler in 1600s New England. Likewise, Mountains of Madness isn’t scary to me, but might be if I was a white supremacist. I appreciate both works more for their atmosphere...