Search results

I don't think 6E should be either Shadowdark or Daggerheart (even though I believe that if 6E came out as one of those 2 rulesets people would love the new D&D). Those games exist. 6E should do something only WotC can do. That means scale and reach and broad appeal. Imagine if 6E actually...

There's nothing worse than white room theorizing: for builds or otherwise. RPGs need to be played to be understood.

For a long time there were weird "rules" based on how things were licensed. My guess is that Namor was part of the FF "group" and that seems to be back in the hands of Marvel.

Yes, there is something of a competition for Sue's affections between Namor and Reed in many FF stories.

Sure, but that sort of thing definitely factors into how and with whom I spend my money -- especially with crowdfunding.

Sure, and lots of folks make great 5E monsters. But WotC seems incapable.

Which is what reduces 5E combat to monsters being uninteresting bags of HP.

I wouldn't expect the PDFs to be free on their own. It just seems odd to charge for them when folks are buying the hardcover. But you know your business best. Good luck with the campaign!

I am still baffled they didn't just recast Kang.

Unless I misread it, the no-PDFs for the 2 books is $20 cheaper than the 2 books with PDFs.

Why is this KS charging extra for the PDFs? That feels weird.

I don't think it is controversial to say that the lead up on IW/EG was much, much better.

Again, this tightly integrates the two axis so that there is only one axis. And that is fine, but not what DH does. it is inherently more limited and limiting than the two axis resolution.

I am not convinced 5E can do horror.

But why would you want that?

I would love to see a new edition focused primarily on the dungeon. It won't happen though.

I remember that Namor/Atlantis was supposed to be a thing for that movie. Do you think Sue is going to get the mom hots for him in Doomsday? More seriously: is that movie any good?

I think the most compelling aspect of an AI GM over just using other solo tools is that it feels like a "person" and therefore the play is much closer to "real" role-playing than GM emulator solo is. You can ask questions in natural language and get an answer from someone besides yourself. And...

Oops, I totally misread your previous post. Lol.

As I stated upthread, I prefer the opportunity-complication axis to be independent of the fail-success axis. It is more interesting that way, IMO.