Recent content by Remathilis

I still think that's a tall order for a couple of people sitting at a table eating snacks and rolling dice. An elf has all the basic thoughts and emotions of a human. They love, laugh, fear, cry, ponder, doubt and hate the same as a human because they are being played by a human. If you wanted...

Gone with the Wind would have been infinitely more interesting with tieflings in it.

A setting can be more than one of those. For example, Eberron supports heroic, mystery, intrigue, urban, war, and a smidge of science. I would hope a new setting would try to check off more than one box.

I play a human in real life. Most games I play offer human as the default choice. Sometimes I've want to play a blue tiefling or an angel person or a cat person because that's a story I don't get to tell everyday.

It was always supposed to be that demihumans had benefits but drawbacks. The biggest one was supposed to be level limits and class restrictions. But the problem was level limits only applied if you got to higher level and multiclassing more than made up for the limitations. Couple that with more...

Yup. My typo. Why do they put the 2 and 3 key so close?

"Your fanged bite is a natural weapon, which counts as a simple melee weapon with which you are proficienct". Dhampir as it was originally printed. Thankfully it was errata'd in Book of Hungers.

I think the issue is +1 thunder gauntlets aren't a real magic weapon anyone can pick up and use. It's like how certain species had natural attacks that counted as weapons. You couldn't make +1 teeth for example. That Said, I'm fine with that being a house rule. It's within the spirit to allow it.

So now I guess I can give feedback on the reanimator artificer. It's not too late, right?

Weeeellll.... Book Oz is public domain. Like a lot of properties, later adaptations are still under copyright and need permission to use elements from it. So WotC could use Oz, but it cannot look like 1929 Oz with Ruby slippers or green skin witches. (Yes, they had to get permission to make...

"A wizard did it" is also a decent explanation.

D&D has canonically allowed reptilian (dragons), undead (vampires) fey (nymphs, satyrs, and hags) and all manner of planar (fiends, angels and genies) to produce viable offspring with humans. Biological compatibility in D&D is more a guideline than an actual rule...

Aka "I have a bunch of examples, but I'm afraid giving them would reveal my biases, so I'll just allude to them and let you try to figure out what they are." Provide examples or we can assume the answer is "none, except for the ones I made up in my head."

I wouldn't worry then. All the +1 spellcasting items, with the exception of the warlock rod, are also only in Tasha and haven't been reprinted. You're in the same boat as wizards, sorcerers, cleric and druids.

I got it yesterday as well after work. Ty.