Recent content by AnotherGuy

  1. A

    D&D General Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition

    This was great -= thanks for sharing. I assume that because grid movement was not a concern at it seems in the above play example you allowed leeway with how much area was covered via the move action?
  2. A

    D&D General Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition

    Yeah fully agree. I have quite the appreciation for how the tiered system worked in 4e, how the progressive engine catered for that (including the use of minions) and its why I favour a system where the first few levels of 5e get traded out (when at high level) for passive benefits to accentuate...
  3. A

    D&D General Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition

    I stand by my non informative statement :ROFLMAO:
  4. A

    D&D General Wildly Diverse "Circus Troupe" Adventuring Parties

    I recognise only Ilsundal and Kagyar, the rest are imposters I say... EDIT: Ordana and Mealiden Starwatcher are also acceptable
  5. A

    GOD RULES: Player's Guide (5e) Previews/Discussion

    Oh I meant it as a once off before the list of creatures like the MM has explanations of things earlier in the book before all the monsters.
  6. A

    D&D General Gargoyles need to be redone.

    Man I wish I had this level of insight into how to roleplay gargoyles just a few weeks earlier when I threw 30 of them at the PCs...ah missed opportunities.
  7. A

    GOD RULES: Player's Guide (5e) Previews/Discussion

    I'm on your side of the pond, but further South. Hope you and the Mrs recover soon. If you are tying LA to the reactions then change the name to LR. It is not confusing at all. If you are worried about it, write a sentence or two about it prior the monster/deity write-ups clarifying it.
  8. A

    Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?

    Reading them is even better :P
  9. A

    D&D General Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition

    I ask because we have homebrewed so much to the point where I cannot honestly comment on RAW PC versus monsters anymore - also we have been focusing on higher levels last few years. The PCs are more powerful at our table due to the use of HD but that is reined in via our exhaustion track, the...
  10. A

    D&D General Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition

    You're saying per RAW 4 x 13th level pcs (feats + magical items) versus CR23 is doable?
  11. A

    D&D General Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition

    I think it comes down to the setting reality. So, I have a level cap of 9 for PCs and NPCs. Something extraordinary needs to happen to awaken or empower the individual to go beyond level 9. Now I realise there is nothing in the game that stipulates this, but having level 20 characters casually...
  12. A

    D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting

    Apparently gods make species through magic and now mortals make species through magic. You're a god, they're god everyone is a god! Yay
  13. A

    D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting

    Where was this defense during the half-orc debacle? Yes agreed.
  14. A

    D&D 5E (2024) WotC Should Make 5.5E Specific Setting

    I've seen this late so I may be retreading ground... So to you Tanis Half-Elven was conceived via magic and not physical? You may want to run this idea past Weis and Hickman. I do not remember you making this argument during the debacle about half-orcs and their origin. Also you're 100% wrong...
  15. A

    D&D General Mike Mearls says control spells are ruining 5th Edition

    So, OPTION 1 11 - Level 1 is traded out 12 - Level 2 is traded out ...etc OPTION 2 17 - Levels 1-4 are traded out 18 - Levels 5-6 are traded out 19 - Levels 7-8 are traded out 20 - Levels 9-10 are traded out OPTION 3a and 3b 20/21 - Levels 1-4 are traded out 21/22 - Levels 5-6 are traded out...
See more
Top