Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Why B/X?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 9164818" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>What in the WORLD!?</p><p></p><p>Absolutely NOT...This isn't actually right at all.</p><p></p><p>OD&D was NOT written to be a dungeon exploration game only. Heck...Outdoor Survival being pushed in the Original Booklets (not quite as strongly as Chainmail, but there was enough of it) should tell you all there is to know about that right there!</p><p></p><p>You think Cthulhu and Elric were "DUNGEON FOCUSED" adventuring inspirations? You think Jack Vance is a Dungeon ONLY inspiration? You think the Lord of the Rings is a "Dungeon Only" inspiration?</p><p></p><p>Heck, even us wargamers knew that it wasn't just a "Dungeon Exploration" item.</p><p></p><p>Even if you stick with what Gygax wrote...his Gord the Rogue was hardly a "Dungeon Exploration" extrapolation of D&D at all!!!</p><p></p><p>So...you're little realm of the earth played it as strictly Dungeon exploration...but don't try to say that's the ONLY way people played it back then...because it was obviously and most definately NOT that way.</p><p></p><p>Heck, my first adventure WAS in a dungeon, but before we entered that dungeon it was entering the sewers in order to try to get into a city. There was far more than just the Dungeon part. That's why there was the Dungeon Board game...and then there was D&D. </p><p></p><p></p><p>OD&D in many ways was far different than what AD&D 1e was by the early 80s (which if I had to guess, is about when you came in?</p><p></p><p>OD&D was the wild west. Anything and everything went on. Half the fun was seeing what you could do with it and what you could create. You had those who played Dragons and advanced their Dragons in wealth and power. You had those who played court intrigues and others who played games where Rangers and Druidic forces roamed the Earth (and then entered these ideas in magazines). There was NO real set way of playing at first. You had a TON of outside and overland adventures, just like you had a ton of Dungeon adventures as well. </p><p></p><p>By the early 80s (maybe late 70s, I think Holmes probably had far more to do with this inspiration than the original AD&D, though perhaps the Solo RPG generators in the DMG may have had something to do with it as well) you DID have a contingent that were focused far more strongly on the Dungeon element. You saw the Dungeon element strongly in competitions (such as the D&D tournaments) and competition modules. This probably gave way to the thing YOU are thinking about, which is the focus on the Dungeon Exploration elements of D&D. </p><p></p><p>Yes, they were there and they WERE strong. They were played by a LARGE number of Gamers in the early 80s, but that's not really how it was at first, at least when I started (I was not the FIRST, but I did start pretty early on. Funny thing, I actually didn't even own a set of the rules when I started playing and didn't even understand the rules, it was all dependent on the DM). </p><p></p><p></p><p>What supplanted?</p><p></p><p>If OSR is trying to only replicate the Dungeon Exploration Experience or focus, it sounds like it's ONLY trying to replicate one form of playing of the early to late 80s gamestyle. Forget Greyhawk, forget Blackmoor...those may have well as never existed as they were different playstyles. </p><p></p><p>WotC style of gameplay is ALSO extremely Different than what 2e gamestyles were. Even if you go with the story rewards idea, that is far different than the idea to kill everything for XP. </p><p></p><p>IF 2e was such a grand departure as you claim, then OSR would have existed when 2e came out. IT didn't.</p><p></p><p>It started when 3e came out and that's when it built up steam.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I don't think OSR covers what you claim it is. OSR, from what I understand was originally in relation to 3e's wide departure from TSR D&D. 3e was no longer really backwards compatible and thus you couldn't really play the same rules as you could previously. Many people were upset about this and wanted a return to the rules of the TSR era games. This started with a focus on 1e style gaming and B/X and BECMI (One humorous thing I relate to others is at first S&W when I first read one of it's first releases was more akin to BECMI than OD&D. I wrote what was probably a rather rude email/letter to them back then about that. Now days it's basically has it's OD&D version if I've heard correctly though). </p><p></p><p>One of the first pioneers of this was OSRIC...which is grand. It doesn't try to define HOW you game, it only presents the rules in a fashion where you can basically play 1e (though originally I think it was written so people could continue to write 1e adventures) with the rules as you once could.</p><p></p><p>OSR was about replicating rules and rule sets so people could play with them and see the beauty of them. NOT to try to say that one gamestyle was better than another in regards to whether you were going to play it as a Dungeon Crawl or an overland adventure.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I have no idea what you mean by this.</p><p></p><p>Okay...those could be fighting words. I'll let you know Gygax was actually a GREAT game designer. Perhaps one of the greatest of that generation. I do have sympathies for Arneson, but I am solidly a Gygax fan.</p><p></p><p>I'll leave it at that because more than that could draw us into an argument which is not fit for this site.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not trying to erase anything. I am trying to clear up what is obviously some confusion about how we actually played AD&D, how it was played, and how things were about back in the day. </p><p></p><p>It is VERY common to see people try to ascribe their style of play as what everyone played or how everyone played. That's extremely common.</p><p></p><p>There are things that we could agree upon very much so (such as Hickman starting something that has changed the way the game is viewed into an evolution of how the game is seen today with Adventure paths and things of that nature). </p><p></p><p>However, saying that 2e is not Old School seems to go contrary to every bit of actual evidence I've seen. I've seen conjectures on this in the thread, but nothing actually substantial. </p><p></p><p>The BIGGEST proof of it though, to me, is the reaction to 3e and OSR itself. OSR came about BECAUSE of the reaction of Old school gamers to it.</p><p></p><p>If 2e had been that great of a departure from 1e, OSR would have started THEN rather than later.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 9164818, member: 4348"] What in the WORLD!? Absolutely NOT...This isn't actually right at all. OD&D was NOT written to be a dungeon exploration game only. Heck...Outdoor Survival being pushed in the Original Booklets (not quite as strongly as Chainmail, but there was enough of it) should tell you all there is to know about that right there! You think Cthulhu and Elric were "DUNGEON FOCUSED" adventuring inspirations? You think Jack Vance is a Dungeon ONLY inspiration? You think the Lord of the Rings is a "Dungeon Only" inspiration? Heck, even us wargamers knew that it wasn't just a "Dungeon Exploration" item. Even if you stick with what Gygax wrote...his Gord the Rogue was hardly a "Dungeon Exploration" extrapolation of D&D at all!!! So...you're little realm of the earth played it as strictly Dungeon exploration...but don't try to say that's the ONLY way people played it back then...because it was obviously and most definately NOT that way. Heck, my first adventure WAS in a dungeon, but before we entered that dungeon it was entering the sewers in order to try to get into a city. There was far more than just the Dungeon part. That's why there was the Dungeon Board game...and then there was D&D. OD&D in many ways was far different than what AD&D 1e was by the early 80s (which if I had to guess, is about when you came in? OD&D was the wild west. Anything and everything went on. Half the fun was seeing what you could do with it and what you could create. You had those who played Dragons and advanced their Dragons in wealth and power. You had those who played court intrigues and others who played games where Rangers and Druidic forces roamed the Earth (and then entered these ideas in magazines). There was NO real set way of playing at first. You had a TON of outside and overland adventures, just like you had a ton of Dungeon adventures as well. By the early 80s (maybe late 70s, I think Holmes probably had far more to do with this inspiration than the original AD&D, though perhaps the Solo RPG generators in the DMG may have had something to do with it as well) you DID have a contingent that were focused far more strongly on the Dungeon element. You saw the Dungeon element strongly in competitions (such as the D&D tournaments) and competition modules. This probably gave way to the thing YOU are thinking about, which is the focus on the Dungeon Exploration elements of D&D. Yes, they were there and they WERE strong. They were played by a LARGE number of Gamers in the early 80s, but that's not really how it was at first, at least when I started (I was not the FIRST, but I did start pretty early on. Funny thing, I actually didn't even own a set of the rules when I started playing and didn't even understand the rules, it was all dependent on the DM). What supplanted? If OSR is trying to only replicate the Dungeon Exploration Experience or focus, it sounds like it's ONLY trying to replicate one form of playing of the early to late 80s gamestyle. Forget Greyhawk, forget Blackmoor...those may have well as never existed as they were different playstyles. WotC style of gameplay is ALSO extremely Different than what 2e gamestyles were. Even if you go with the story rewards idea, that is far different than the idea to kill everything for XP. IF 2e was such a grand departure as you claim, then OSR would have existed when 2e came out. IT didn't. It started when 3e came out and that's when it built up steam. No, I don't think OSR covers what you claim it is. OSR, from what I understand was originally in relation to 3e's wide departure from TSR D&D. 3e was no longer really backwards compatible and thus you couldn't really play the same rules as you could previously. Many people were upset about this and wanted a return to the rules of the TSR era games. This started with a focus on 1e style gaming and B/X and BECMI (One humorous thing I relate to others is at first S&W when I first read one of it's first releases was more akin to BECMI than OD&D. I wrote what was probably a rather rude email/letter to them back then about that. Now days it's basically has it's OD&D version if I've heard correctly though). One of the first pioneers of this was OSRIC...which is grand. It doesn't try to define HOW you game, it only presents the rules in a fashion where you can basically play 1e (though originally I think it was written so people could continue to write 1e adventures) with the rules as you once could. OSR was about replicating rules and rule sets so people could play with them and see the beauty of them. NOT to try to say that one gamestyle was better than another in regards to whether you were going to play it as a Dungeon Crawl or an overland adventure. I have no idea what you mean by this. Okay...those could be fighting words. I'll let you know Gygax was actually a GREAT game designer. Perhaps one of the greatest of that generation. I do have sympathies for Arneson, but I am solidly a Gygax fan. I'll leave it at that because more than that could draw us into an argument which is not fit for this site. I'm not trying to erase anything. I am trying to clear up what is obviously some confusion about how we actually played AD&D, how it was played, and how things were about back in the day. It is VERY common to see people try to ascribe their style of play as what everyone played or how everyone played. That's extremely common. There are things that we could agree upon very much so (such as Hickman starting something that has changed the way the game is viewed into an evolution of how the game is seen today with Adventure paths and things of that nature). However, saying that 2e is not Old School seems to go contrary to every bit of actual evidence I've seen. I've seen conjectures on this in the thread, but nothing actually substantial. The BIGGEST proof of it though, to me, is the reaction to 3e and OSR itself. OSR came about BECAUSE of the reaction of Old school gamers to it. If 2e had been that great of a departure from 1e, OSR would have started THEN rather than later. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Why B/X?
Top