Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What's so Funny, Anyway: Is it Time to Comedies Seriously?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9244312" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>In a recent thread ranking Coen Brothers movies, [USER=11760]@Whizbang Dustyboots[/USER] wrote the following-</p><p></p><p><em>What I'm getting from this list is that you're not a big fan of screwball comedy. You have ranked Intolerable Cruelty, Hudsucker Proxy, the transcendent O, Brother, Where Art Thou? and Raising Arizona way too low as a result.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Also, you like depressing movies, which isn't what I would have guessed.</em></p><p></p><p>And while I responded to the comment in-thread (I do, in fact, love comedies!), the comment really stuck with me. Comedy ... it's hard. Ask any struggling standup staring out into the abyss that is a silent audience. Or think of anytime you've seen a supposedly comedic movie that is a massive misfire. And yet, while we all know that comedy is hard, whenever we look at what people think of as important, we rarely think of comedies. Look at the most recent Emmys (which I just <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/your-2023-emmys-recap.702113/" target="_blank">recapped for you here</a>, because I am nothing if not your faithful servant). I love ... absolutely LOVE <em>The Bear</em>, and think it is one of the best and most vital television programs airing right now. I think that it deserves every award it can get, and it received a lot of awards. </p><p></p><p>But it won all the awards in the <em>comedy</em> category. Shows like <em>Ted Lasso</em>, <em>Jury Duty, </em>and <em>Abbott Elementary</em>. As much as I love <em>The Bear</em>, and while it has moments of levity, I know for a fact that I laugh less during that show than I do while watching <em>Succession</em>, the winner of the drama category. But we see that a serious show triumphs over shows that <em>merely </em>provide humor.</p><p></p><p>This example is repeated over and over again when it comes to critical praise. Take the Oscars (PLEASE!). In the entire history of the Academy Awards, there are almost no comedies even nominated for Best Picture ... and the last true comedy to win an Oscar for best picture was <em>Annie Hall </em>in 1977 (no, <em>The Artist</em> doesn't count). Or look at the <a href="https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movies/" target="_blank">AFI's list of the greatest American Films</a> (100 years, 100 movies). You have to get to number 14 (<em>Some Like it Hot) </em>to find a true comedy, and throughout the list, the pickings are slim ... although <em>DUCK SOUP! </em>YES!</p><p></p><p>Looking back at my own list for the Coen Brothers, I think I was very fair (I did have their comedies at numbers 3, 4, and 7), but I also noticed that I clustered many of their comedies toward the back. Heck, I acknowledged that I love <em>Hudsucker Proxy</em> and <em>Burn After Reading</em>, but ranked them below<em> Inside Llewelyn Davis</em> ... despite the fact that I have joyously rewatched the two comedies multiple times, and have never returned to ILD. </p><p></p><p>So what's the deal? Why do we generally see that people reward those things that bring us down, and yet we usually denigrate the things that bring us joy?</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>1. Comedy May Be Hard, But We Don't Value It, and It's Also More Specific</strong></p><p></p><p>I am going to be brief in my analysis, since I think it boils down to three simple factors. First, we have a societal bias toward treating serious issues ... seriously. Yes, we can use comedy to provoke, offend, and shock ... and it can have a real message (if you doubt that, watch Charlie Chaplin's <em>The Great Dictator</em>). But while comedy can be used to make important points (see also <em>The Lobster</em>), the main point of comedy is to <em>make people laugh</em>.</p><p></p><p>Many of the greatest comedies are great because they start you laughing, and they never let up. I have never, once in my life, turned down an opportunity to watch <em>Talladega Nights </em>or <em>Anchorman</em>. Are they making deep philosophical points? No, they aren't. But did they make me laugh so hard that certain scenes and turns of phrase were etched into my brain? Yes, yes they did. </p><p><em>Sixty percent of the time, it works every time</em>.</p><p><em>I like to think of Jesus as an Ice Dancer, dressed in an all-white jumpsuit, and doing an interpretive dance of my life.</em></p><p></p><p>I'm sure we can all think of similar movies (Monty Python, anyone?). But when a movie is solely trying to get you to laugh, it often has to do so at the expense of any larger themes. I love <em>Airplane!</em>, but it didn't make me ponder the meaning of life, so much as make inappropriate quotes to various people after seeing it. And for that reason, some of the most successful comedies are often viewed as lesser-than because they don't explore deeper issues. The comedies that are highly regarded (<em>Dr. Strangelove</em>) are usually the ones that, instead of just going purely for the laughs, are doing so for some other reason.</p><p></p><p>Which brings me to the second point- this societal bias is both internalized and reified by critics, serious moviegoers, and the people making movies. If you're a person who likes "good movies," then you believe that the best movies mean something. And if you're an actor, you will likely want to appear in <em>serious and meaningful</em> roles and movies. Adam Sandler has made a lot of money making comedies, but ask any real movie fan about him, and they'll go on about how he needs to make more movies like <em>Punch Drunk Love, Uncut Gems,</em> and<em> Funny People. </em></p><p></p><p>Finally, there is the third factor. In my opinion, more than any other genre, comedies often will be "of their time." Think of the two movies I mentioned- <em>Talladega Nights </em>and <em>Anchorman</em>. They date back to 2004 and 2006. They are still funny, and yet there are parts that ... haven't aged perfectly. Or <em>Tropic Thunder</em>, from 2008, a film that was an amazing comedy, but certainly has hard-to-explain parts today ... sixteen years later. A lot of comedy can be boundary-pushing, or it can be topical, or it can otherwise reflect the zeitgeist of the time in a way that is required for the comedy to work. While other genres also necessarily reflect their times, comedies are different because the purpose of a comedy is ... to evoke laughter, and once certain connections to a period of time are broken (or recontextualized) that fails. It's not always true- certain styles of comedy, such as more absurdist comedy, can age better (again, such as parts of Monty Python), but generally comedies age less well than most other genres.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>2. Okay, So What?</strong></p><p></p><p>Well, normally I have a bigger point to make here, but instead I'll just leave with the Zack Snyder Postulate- grim is easy, but just because something is grim, doesn't mean that it's good. I think that we can fall into the trap of overvaluing dark and serious, and forgetting just how hard comedy is to pull off. Truly great comedy (on the screen) is an alchemy of great writing, acting, chemistry, and timing. Whereas anyone can just make things grimdark and brutal and throw in a reference to how someone is dying for our sins, just like that other guy.</p><p></p><p>That said, making truly transcendent and serious works of art does matter. I love certain comedies because they always make me laugh, but there are other films that will stick in your head for weeks and months and make you really think about them. I might have watched <em>Anchorman</em> a lot, but I haven't given any real thought to its cinematography, or its deeper themes.</p><p></p><p>I also think that we can see this play out, to a certain small extent, in our own TTRPG sphere. Comedy is hard, really hard, which is why there are so few games that are comedy-first. <em>Paranoia</em>. <em>Toon</em>. <em>Kobolds Ate My Baby</em>! On the other hand, we often see games go dark (horror, grimdark) because, for lack of a better term, it's easier. It doesn't mean that it's good, but it's generally easier.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Anyway, wanted to throw out those thoughts, since I've been thinking about them since the comment. Have at it!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9244312, member: 7023840"] In a recent thread ranking Coen Brothers movies, [USER=11760]@Whizbang Dustyboots[/USER] wrote the following- [I]What I'm getting from this list is that you're not a big fan of screwball comedy. You have ranked Intolerable Cruelty, Hudsucker Proxy, the transcendent O, Brother, Where Art Thou? and Raising Arizona way too low as a result. Also, you like depressing movies, which isn't what I would have guessed.[/I] And while I responded to the comment in-thread (I do, in fact, love comedies!), the comment really stuck with me. Comedy ... it's hard. Ask any struggling standup staring out into the abyss that is a silent audience. Or think of anytime you've seen a supposedly comedic movie that is a massive misfire. And yet, while we all know that comedy is hard, whenever we look at what people think of as important, we rarely think of comedies. Look at the most recent Emmys (which I just [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/your-2023-emmys-recap.702113/']recapped for you here[/URL], because I am nothing if not your faithful servant). I love ... absolutely LOVE [I]The Bear[/I], and think it is one of the best and most vital television programs airing right now. I think that it deserves every award it can get, and it received a lot of awards. But it won all the awards in the [I]comedy[/I] category. Shows like [I]Ted Lasso[/I], [I]Jury Duty, [/I]and [I]Abbott Elementary[/I]. As much as I love [I]The Bear[/I], and while it has moments of levity, I know for a fact that I laugh less during that show than I do while watching [I]Succession[/I], the winner of the drama category. But we see that a serious show triumphs over shows that [I]merely [/I]provide humor. This example is repeated over and over again when it comes to critical praise. Take the Oscars (PLEASE!). In the entire history of the Academy Awards, there are almost no comedies even nominated for Best Picture ... and the last true comedy to win an Oscar for best picture was [I]Annie Hall [/I]in 1977 (no, [I]The Artist[/I] doesn't count). Or look at the [URL='https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movies/']AFI's list of the greatest American Films[/URL] (100 years, 100 movies). You have to get to number 14 ([I]Some Like it Hot) [/I]to find a true comedy, and throughout the list, the pickings are slim ... although [I]DUCK SOUP! [/I]YES! Looking back at my own list for the Coen Brothers, I think I was very fair (I did have their comedies at numbers 3, 4, and 7), but I also noticed that I clustered many of their comedies toward the back. Heck, I acknowledged that I love [I]Hudsucker Proxy[/I] and [I]Burn After Reading[/I], but ranked them below[I] Inside Llewelyn Davis[/I] ... despite the fact that I have joyously rewatched the two comedies multiple times, and have never returned to ILD. So what's the deal? Why do we generally see that people reward those things that bring us down, and yet we usually denigrate the things that bring us joy? [B]1. Comedy May Be Hard, But We Don't Value It, and It's Also More Specific[/B] I am going to be brief in my analysis, since I think it boils down to three simple factors. First, we have a societal bias toward treating serious issues ... seriously. Yes, we can use comedy to provoke, offend, and shock ... and it can have a real message (if you doubt that, watch Charlie Chaplin's [I]The Great Dictator[/I]). But while comedy can be used to make important points (see also [I]The Lobster[/I]), the main point of comedy is to [I]make people laugh[/I]. Many of the greatest comedies are great because they start you laughing, and they never let up. I have never, once in my life, turned down an opportunity to watch [I]Talladega Nights [/I]or [I]Anchorman[/I]. Are they making deep philosophical points? No, they aren't. But did they make me laugh so hard that certain scenes and turns of phrase were etched into my brain? Yes, yes they did. [I]Sixty percent of the time, it works every time[/I]. [I]I like to think of Jesus as an Ice Dancer, dressed in an all-white jumpsuit, and doing an interpretive dance of my life.[/I] I'm sure we can all think of similar movies (Monty Python, anyone?). But when a movie is solely trying to get you to laugh, it often has to do so at the expense of any larger themes. I love [I]Airplane![/I], but it didn't make me ponder the meaning of life, so much as make inappropriate quotes to various people after seeing it. And for that reason, some of the most successful comedies are often viewed as lesser-than because they don't explore deeper issues. The comedies that are highly regarded ([I]Dr. Strangelove[/I]) are usually the ones that, instead of just going purely for the laughs, are doing so for some other reason. Which brings me to the second point- this societal bias is both internalized and reified by critics, serious moviegoers, and the people making movies. If you're a person who likes "good movies," then you believe that the best movies mean something. And if you're an actor, you will likely want to appear in [I]serious and meaningful[/I] roles and movies. Adam Sandler has made a lot of money making comedies, but ask any real movie fan about him, and they'll go on about how he needs to make more movies like [I]Punch Drunk Love, Uncut Gems,[/I] and[I] Funny People. [/I] Finally, there is the third factor. In my opinion, more than any other genre, comedies often will be "of their time." Think of the two movies I mentioned- [I]Talladega Nights [/I]and [I]Anchorman[/I]. They date back to 2004 and 2006. They are still funny, and yet there are parts that ... haven't aged perfectly. Or [I]Tropic Thunder[/I], from 2008, a film that was an amazing comedy, but certainly has hard-to-explain parts today ... sixteen years later. A lot of comedy can be boundary-pushing, or it can be topical, or it can otherwise reflect the zeitgeist of the time in a way that is required for the comedy to work. While other genres also necessarily reflect their times, comedies are different because the purpose of a comedy is ... to evoke laughter, and once certain connections to a period of time are broken (or recontextualized) that fails. It's not always true- certain styles of comedy, such as more absurdist comedy, can age better (again, such as parts of Monty Python), but generally comedies age less well than most other genres. [B]2. Okay, So What?[/B] Well, normally I have a bigger point to make here, but instead I'll just leave with the Zack Snyder Postulate- grim is easy, but just because something is grim, doesn't mean that it's good. I think that we can fall into the trap of overvaluing dark and serious, and forgetting just how hard comedy is to pull off. Truly great comedy (on the screen) is an alchemy of great writing, acting, chemistry, and timing. Whereas anyone can just make things grimdark and brutal and throw in a reference to how someone is dying for our sins, just like that other guy. That said, making truly transcendent and serious works of art does matter. I love certain comedies because they always make me laugh, but there are other films that will stick in your head for weeks and months and make you really think about them. I might have watched [I]Anchorman[/I] a lot, but I haven't given any real thought to its cinematography, or its deeper themes. I also think that we can see this play out, to a certain small extent, in our own TTRPG sphere. Comedy is hard, really hard, which is why there are so few games that are comedy-first. [I]Paranoia[/I]. [I]Toon[/I]. [I]Kobolds Ate My Baby[/I]! On the other hand, we often see games go dark (horror, grimdark) because, for lack of a better term, it's easier. It doesn't mean that it's good, but it's generally easier. Anyway, wanted to throw out those thoughts, since I've been thinking about them since the comment. Have at it! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What's so Funny, Anyway: Is it Time to Comedies Seriously?
Top