Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Are You Bad At?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corone" data-source="post: 8254124" data-attributes="member: 6806393"><p>Most role-playing characters are heroes, some are even super heroes, so it’s hard to imagine them being bad at anything. If you are working with a system that rewards optimisation (like D&D) it’s even harder. Such systems not only make it harder to build in a weakness they actively encourage you to avoid doing so.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]135957[/ATTACH]</p> <p style="text-align: center"><a href="https://pixabay.com/photos/sword-man-weapon-figure-male-4335918/" target="_blank">Picture courtesy of Pixabay.</a></p><h2>Why Be Bad?</h2><p>Why be bad at anything anyway? Aren’t heroes meant to be competent? What’s the use of not being able to pick the lock or fight the bad guy? You might think that just sucks and you’d be right. In some circumstances it does, but that still doesn’t mean you should try and focus on a character that is good at everything. I’ll explain myself in two ways here, and appeal to not only the role-play aspect of your character, but the systematic part as well.</p><h2>Systematic Flaws</h2><p>The systematic reasons are pretty simple. In most systems you only have so many points. If you want to be a fighter, you won’t be able to be a wizard or a rogue as well. If you can hit things, you can leave the lock picking and fireballs to other people. Spending some points to specialise and get really good at what you are meant to be good at will leave you unable to cover anyone else’s job. I’d argue that’s a good thing. You can have a chance to shine when your character is using their speciality, and someone else can when using theirs.</p><p></p><p>It’s also good for group dynamics. If you can’t pick a lock you need the rogue. If you can’t hit stuff you need the fighter. If everyone is playing a Fighter/Wizard/Cleric/Rogue then you have a party full of people moderately competent at everything who always fight to try and be the one to do anything. A little specialisation will make you awesome at something and the cost is to be bad at something else. In a sense this is the sort of optimisation I can get behind. Pick what your character is good at, and be good at just that. Trust the other players to cover your back with characters who compliment yours.</p><p></p><p>In some systems you are actively encouraged to take flaws and gain some points for them. It can be problematic doing so as you tend to pick them just to get the points for what you want, doing your best to avoid anything challenging. But such systems also recognise that failings and problems offer a chance for a more rounded and believable character.</p><h2>Role-Playing Weaknesses</h2><p>From a role-play perspective, a weakness is always a good thing. Sure, there will be a moment when your character looks like a loser sometimes. But if they never have those moments, they are two dimensional and just good at everything. To be honest, those are pretty boring characters. Weaknesses will make your character more realistic and grant you opportunities for storytelling. Let me illustrate with a few examples.</p><p></p><p>In the <strong>A-Team </strong>(<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_A-Team" target="_blank">an American action-adventure television series that ran on NBC from 1983 to 1987</a>), <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._A._Baracus" target="_blank">BA Barracus</a> is scared of flying. It doesn’t make him less of a hero and doesn’t make him less good at his job of cracking the heads of bad guys. But every week the team has to try and find a way to get BA on an aeroplane without his knowledge. There is story and sub plot there as they try and trick, cajole or just kidnap their friend to get him from point A to B. Now this isn’t necessarily fun to do every week, so the GM just needs to make sure a plane ride isn’t on the cards every adventure. But despite being a powerful heroic character, BA is made more real with a little extra weakness.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>A-Team </strong>is a good example of flaws beyond B.A. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templeton_Peck" target="_blank">Face</a> has a weakness for the opposite gender and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howling_Mad_Murdock" target="_blank">Murdock</a> is insane. Sometimes weaknesses can be a little too much, so you might want to dial them down. But what makes the adventures of the <strong>A-Team </strong>fun to watch isn’t usually them taking down the bad guys but dealing with their own problems and issues as they do so. The fact they are being hunted and are unwilling to kill anyone might also be considered weaknesses, and both are a driving force in their stories.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/pendragon-a-game-design-masterclass.666703/" target="_blank"><strong>Pendragon</strong></a> also offers good examples of fleshing out your character and creating story with weaknesses. The personality trait system means you are making tests not only to be brave, but to avoid being cowardly for example.</p><p></p><p>Now, no one wants to be the knight who runs in fear from a battle. But all human being make mistakes and everyone has a bad day, no matter how good they are. What matters is not whether or not it happens, but what your character does about it afterwards. Such actions create story from the shame of failure. Lancelot spends months in the wilderness, devastated by the feeling he has betrayed his greatest love (Genevieve) when he is seduced by Elaine. These stories are not just extra side plots, they are epics. The weaker the character has proved to be, or the graver their mistakes, the more epic the story and their attempt to return to grace.</p><p></p><p>So, when figuring out where your character is cool, find something they aren’t good with. For <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Jones" target="_blank"><strong>Indiana Jones</strong></a> it was snakes, Malcolm Reynolds (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Reynolds" target="_blank"><strong>Firefly</strong></a>) couldn’t quite leave the war behind, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frodo_Baggins" target="_blank">Frodo</a> wasn’t quite strong enough to resist the call of the One Ring, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elric_of_Melnibon%C3%A9" target="_blank">Elric</a> needed a demonic sword to be strong, and even Superman had an issue with <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryptonite" target="_blank">kryptonite</a>. It is these weaknesses that help define these characters and makes them more interesting without crippling them. Give your own characters a failing and see what it takes your stories.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corone, post: 8254124, member: 6806393"] Most role-playing characters are heroes, some are even super heroes, so it’s hard to imagine them being bad at anything. If you are working with a system that rewards optimisation (like D&D) it’s even harder. Such systems not only make it harder to build in a weakness they actively encourage you to avoid doing so. [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" alt="sword-4335918_960_720.jpg"]135957[/ATTACH] [URL='https://pixabay.com/photos/sword-man-weapon-figure-male-4335918/']Picture courtesy of Pixabay.[/URL][/CENTER] [HEADING=1]Why Be Bad?[/HEADING] Why be bad at anything anyway? Aren’t heroes meant to be competent? What’s the use of not being able to pick the lock or fight the bad guy? You might think that just sucks and you’d be right. In some circumstances it does, but that still doesn’t mean you should try and focus on a character that is good at everything. I’ll explain myself in two ways here, and appeal to not only the role-play aspect of your character, but the systematic part as well. [HEADING=1]Systematic Flaws[/HEADING] The systematic reasons are pretty simple. In most systems you only have so many points. If you want to be a fighter, you won’t be able to be a wizard or a rogue as well. If you can hit things, you can leave the lock picking and fireballs to other people. Spending some points to specialise and get really good at what you are meant to be good at will leave you unable to cover anyone else’s job. I’d argue that’s a good thing. You can have a chance to shine when your character is using their speciality, and someone else can when using theirs. It’s also good for group dynamics. If you can’t pick a lock you need the rogue. If you can’t hit stuff you need the fighter. If everyone is playing a Fighter/Wizard/Cleric/Rogue then you have a party full of people moderately competent at everything who always fight to try and be the one to do anything. A little specialisation will make you awesome at something and the cost is to be bad at something else. In a sense this is the sort of optimisation I can get behind. Pick what your character is good at, and be good at just that. Trust the other players to cover your back with characters who compliment yours. In some systems you are actively encouraged to take flaws and gain some points for them. It can be problematic doing so as you tend to pick them just to get the points for what you want, doing your best to avoid anything challenging. But such systems also recognise that failings and problems offer a chance for a more rounded and believable character. [HEADING=1]Role-Playing Weaknesses[/HEADING] From a role-play perspective, a weakness is always a good thing. Sure, there will be a moment when your character looks like a loser sometimes. But if they never have those moments, they are two dimensional and just good at everything. To be honest, those are pretty boring characters. Weaknesses will make your character more realistic and grant you opportunities for storytelling. Let me illustrate with a few examples. In the [B]A-Team [/B]([URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_A-Team']an American action-adventure television series that ran on NBC from 1983 to 1987[/URL]), [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._A._Baracus']BA Barracus[/URL] is scared of flying. It doesn’t make him less of a hero and doesn’t make him less good at his job of cracking the heads of bad guys. But every week the team has to try and find a way to get BA on an aeroplane without his knowledge. There is story and sub plot there as they try and trick, cajole or just kidnap their friend to get him from point A to B. Now this isn’t necessarily fun to do every week, so the GM just needs to make sure a plane ride isn’t on the cards every adventure. But despite being a powerful heroic character, BA is made more real with a little extra weakness. The [B]A-Team [/B]is a good example of flaws beyond B.A. [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templeton_Peck']Face[/URL] has a weakness for the opposite gender and [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howling_Mad_Murdock']Murdock[/URL] is insane. Sometimes weaknesses can be a little too much, so you might want to dial them down. But what makes the adventures of the [B]A-Team [/B]fun to watch isn’t usually them taking down the bad guys but dealing with their own problems and issues as they do so. The fact they are being hunted and are unwilling to kill anyone might also be considered weaknesses, and both are a driving force in their stories. [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/pendragon-a-game-design-masterclass.666703/'][B]Pendragon[/B][/URL][B] [/B]also offers good examples of fleshing out your character and creating story with weaknesses. The personality trait system means you are making tests not only to be brave, but to avoid being cowardly for example. Now, no one wants to be the knight who runs in fear from a battle. But all human being make mistakes and everyone has a bad day, no matter how good they are. What matters is not whether or not it happens, but what your character does about it afterwards. Such actions create story from the shame of failure. Lancelot spends months in the wilderness, devastated by the feeling he has betrayed his greatest love (Genevieve) when he is seduced by Elaine. These stories are not just extra side plots, they are epics. The weaker the character has proved to be, or the graver their mistakes, the more epic the story and their attempt to return to grace. So, when figuring out where your character is cool, find something they aren’t good with. For [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Jones'][B]Indiana Jones[/B][/URL][B] [/B]it was snakes, Malcolm Reynolds ([URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Reynolds'][B]Firefly[/B][/URL]) couldn’t quite leave the war behind, [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frodo_Baggins']Frodo[/URL] wasn’t quite strong enough to resist the call of the One Ring, [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elric_of_Melnibon%C3%A9']Elric[/URL] needed a demonic sword to be strong, and even Superman had an issue with [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryptonite']kryptonite[/URL]. It is these weaknesses that help define these characters and makes them more interesting without crippling them. Give your own characters a failing and see what it takes your stories. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Are You Bad At?
Top