Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Double-Edged Sword: Is The New D&D Edition a Cash Grab in Disguise?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 9300683" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>I'm not sure of your age and thus what edition rollouts you're cognizant of, but new editions have been part of D&D's history for 47 years, going back to the released of AD&D in 1977. It is part of the nature of the game - that it is a living thing, not static. Part of this is due to the complex nature of the game, but also the fact that both players and designers (who are also players) like to tinker and try to improve the game.</p><p></p><p>Is it a "cash grab?" Of course, but I would say "also/both," that is <em>in addition to </em>just being a new iteration of the game that incorporates 10 years of playing, and thus ways to (in theory) improve the play experience. Meaning, it is a way for WotC to make a lot of money because they make a lot more on core rulebooks than supplements, but <em>it is also </em>a way to improve the game--or at least, change (to whatever degree) it, hopefully for the better.</p><p></p><p>Or to put it another way, here are the years that we've seen new editions/revisions:</p><p></p><p>AD&D/D&D: 1974, 1977, 1989, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2024</p><p>B/X/BECMI: 1974, 1981, 1983, 1991, 2000, 2003, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2024</p><p></p><p>Some of those editions/revisions didn't absolutely necessitate buying the core rulebooks (e.g. 1995) but most were significant enough that most did, and most did so happily. But as you can see, at 10 years it is the longest span in D&D's history.</p><p></p><p>You're getting a lot of pushback mostly because the term "cash grab" is intrinsically pejorative in implication, as if they're only doing it to make money and exploit people. But this ignores the nature of D&D as a changing game, and the fact that most players are actually excited and happy about shiny new books. And most--or at least many--enjoying learning the new works of the new edition. In other words, you're ignoring the important part: That new versions of D&D are, for most, a feature and not a flaw of the game's tradition.</p><p></p><p>Is 2024 a new edition or a revision? To be honest, I haven't followed its development closely enough to have a strong opinion, but my sense is that--based upon what I've read--it is much closer to a revision than an edition. Perhaps something more than, say, the 1995 revised AD&D 2E which primarily just re-formatted the rulebooks with some some optional bells and whistles, but less than 3.5E which was a moderate overhaul of at least some portions of the rules, even if it was still basically the same edition (thus aptly called "3.5" and not "4E"). If 1995 was "2.1" and 2003 was "3.5," then 2024 seems like "5.2" or "5.3."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 9300683, member: 59082"] I'm not sure of your age and thus what edition rollouts you're cognizant of, but new editions have been part of D&D's history for 47 years, going back to the released of AD&D in 1977. It is part of the nature of the game - that it is a living thing, not static. Part of this is due to the complex nature of the game, but also the fact that both players and designers (who are also players) like to tinker and try to improve the game. Is it a "cash grab?" Of course, but I would say "also/both," that is [I]in addition to [/I]just being a new iteration of the game that incorporates 10 years of playing, and thus ways to (in theory) improve the play experience. Meaning, it is a way for WotC to make a lot of money because they make a lot more on core rulebooks than supplements, but [I]it is also [/I]a way to improve the game--or at least, change (to whatever degree) it, hopefully for the better. Or to put it another way, here are the years that we've seen new editions/revisions: AD&D/D&D: 1974, 1977, 1989, 1995, 2000, 2003, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2024 B/X/BECMI: 1974, 1981, 1983, 1991, 2000, 2003, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2024 Some of those editions/revisions didn't absolutely necessitate buying the core rulebooks (e.g. 1995) but most were significant enough that most did, and most did so happily. But as you can see, at 10 years it is the longest span in D&D's history. You're getting a lot of pushback mostly because the term "cash grab" is intrinsically pejorative in implication, as if they're only doing it to make money and exploit people. But this ignores the nature of D&D as a changing game, and the fact that most players are actually excited and happy about shiny new books. And most--or at least many--enjoying learning the new works of the new edition. In other words, you're ignoring the important part: That new versions of D&D are, for most, a feature and not a flaw of the game's tradition. Is 2024 a new edition or a revision? To be honest, I haven't followed its development closely enough to have a strong opinion, but my sense is that--based upon what I've read--it is much closer to a revision than an edition. Perhaps something more than, say, the 1995 revised AD&D 2E which primarily just re-formatted the rulebooks with some some optional bells and whistles, but less than 3.5E which was a moderate overhaul of at least some portions of the rules, even if it was still basically the same edition (thus aptly called "3.5" and not "4E"). If 1995 was "2.1" and 2003 was "3.5," then 2024 seems like "5.2" or "5.3." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Double-Edged Sword: Is The New D&D Edition a Cash Grab in Disguise?
Top