Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Permanency scroll cost
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Antikinesis" data-source="post: 223745" data-attributes="member: 1437"><p><strong>I was only initially "wrong" in that I called the item a "wand" when in fact it's a wondrous item … you seemed to believe it was necessary to say it was wrong yet again ….</strong></p><p></p><p>Since you have finally <em>admitted</em> you were wrong when calling it a wand, and since I have finally successfully stated my view on this subtopic in such a manner that you have gleaned its meaning, I have no objection to dropping the issue.</p><p></p><p><strong>You have, essentially, wasted everyone's time with your useless banter.</strong></p><p></p><p>That’s okay, everyone else probably stopped reading about a half-dozen messages ago. Maybe more. This is between you and me, hombre.</p><p></p><p><em>I pointed out that your wondrous-item-workaround calls this assertion </em>[can’t cast two spells at once]<em> into question. </em></p><p><strong>No you didn't. You made a pointless and worthless comment about a legally constructed magic item.</strong></p><p></p><p>I regret my failure to express the concept in terms that you could grasp. Mea culpa.</p><p></p><p><strong>You are simply too dense to notice. But I'm getting a real kick watching you make a fool outta yourself.</strong></p><p> </p><p>Resorting to personal insults now? I’m disappointed, Not-Sean. I expected better from you. You are becoming bitter in your defeat.</p><p></p><p><strong>Please. Continue.</strong></p><p></p><p>I’m still finding this entertaining, so continue I shall. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p><strong>You are not including the entire post in a shameful attempt to twist my words.</strong></p><p></p><p>I am not including the entire post in a shameful attempt to reduce the amount of material to a scale that you can assimilate in its entirety, in order to demonstrate to you that you are contradicting yourself.</p><p></p><p><strong>You have accomplished nothing but show everyone your short attention span. … You have failed to make your point. </strong></p><p></p><p>Regrettably, you appear to be correct in that I have not accomplished my goal of filtering the content down to core concepts within your ability to comprehend.</p><p></p><p><strong>In the complete passage I explained that the spells could be placed upon the scroll separately.</strong></p><p></p><p>Yup. No debate here. And I suggested that making a wondrous item resembling a scroll (similar to your wand-like wondrous item) would, within the rules, allow permanent darkvision via a single use of the item.</p><p></p><p><strong>I never said it wasn't a house rule.… I never claimed it wasn't a house rule.… It's my house rule, and I never said it wasn't a house rule… the second and third are houes rules.</strong></p><p></p><p>It sounds like you decided that was a house rule. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> In light of this information, I apologize for misinterpreting your commentary on my lack of attention span as an attempt to contradict my labeling the house rule, instead of taking the commentary for the personal attack it was intended to be. I regret that such future attacks will probably also be misinterpreted, as I have a tendency to give a person the benefit of the doubt.</p><p></p><p>Wheeeeeeee…. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>-AK</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Antikinesis, post: 223745, member: 1437"] [B]I was only initially "wrong" in that I called the item a "wand" when in fact it's a wondrous item … you seemed to believe it was necessary to say it was wrong yet again ….[/B] Since you have finally [I]admitted[/I] you were wrong when calling it a wand, and since I have finally successfully stated my view on this subtopic in such a manner that you have gleaned its meaning, I have no objection to dropping the issue. [B]You have, essentially, wasted everyone's time with your useless banter.[/B] That’s okay, everyone else probably stopped reading about a half-dozen messages ago. Maybe more. This is between you and me, hombre. [I]I pointed out that your wondrous-item-workaround calls this assertion [/I][can’t cast two spells at once][I] into question. [/I] [B]No you didn't. You made a pointless and worthless comment about a legally constructed magic item.[/B] I regret my failure to express the concept in terms that you could grasp. Mea culpa. [B]You are simply too dense to notice. But I'm getting a real kick watching you make a fool outta yourself.[/B] Resorting to personal insults now? I’m disappointed, Not-Sean. I expected better from you. You are becoming bitter in your defeat. [B]Please. Continue.[/B] I’m still finding this entertaining, so continue I shall. :) [B]You are not including the entire post in a shameful attempt to twist my words.[/B] I am not including the entire post in a shameful attempt to reduce the amount of material to a scale that you can assimilate in its entirety, in order to demonstrate to you that you are contradicting yourself. [B]You have accomplished nothing but show everyone your short attention span. … You have failed to make your point. [/B] Regrettably, you appear to be correct in that I have not accomplished my goal of filtering the content down to core concepts within your ability to comprehend. [B]In the complete passage I explained that the spells could be placed upon the scroll separately.[/B] Yup. No debate here. And I suggested that making a wondrous item resembling a scroll (similar to your wand-like wondrous item) would, within the rules, allow permanent darkvision via a single use of the item. [B]I never said it wasn't a house rule.… I never claimed it wasn't a house rule.… It's my house rule, and I never said it wasn't a house rule… the second and third are houes rules.[/B] It sounds like you decided that was a house rule. :D In light of this information, I apologize for misinterpreting your commentary on my lack of attention span as an attempt to contradict my labeling the house rule, instead of taking the commentary for the personal attack it was intended to be. I regret that such future attacks will probably also be misinterpreted, as I have a tendency to give a person the benefit of the doubt. Wheeeeeeee…. :) -AK [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Permanency scroll cost
Top