Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think the choice of Species / Race / Ancestry has more to do with Story than Rules...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9312405" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>It would open it up somewhat, but it wouldn't be night and day, for me.</p><p></p><p>There are a few races in D&D so bad that I wouldn't even consider them, especially not after free stat choice. PHB Dragonborn are one. But there aren't many. Maybe a double-handful at most.</p><p></p><p>And I tend to like outre races, and in 5E, those have also tended to be pretty good and powerful. Like, I might well play a Satyr or Yuan-Ti based on their basic concept alone - indeed, the Satyr illustration (I know it was stolen from MtG!) is so fantastic it made me immediately want to play one!</p><p></p><p>This one:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]356742[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Full of energy, joy, life, fun. </p><p></p><p>Not this tired, generic and forgettable nonsense:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]356743[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>YAAAAAWN! Please no more "floating on a white background" race illustrations EVER. PLEASE WOTC. I BEG THEE!</p><p></p><p>You know what I'd never play again without it offering a mechanical benefit though? A BLOODY ELF. Half-Elf or similar, sure. Not another bloody elf though!</p><p></p><p>But you theory is, I think, broadly correct - most people, most of the time, are picking races primarily for the vibes, for the roleplaying, for the cool ears, and so on. There are certain races that are elevated or pushed down by being mechanically awful or great. Elves in 5E, for example, are simply boosted wildly by being overpowered. As they have been in most editions. Take aware the mechanical advantages, including their sleep advantage, and they'd still have devotees because they're pretty, anti-hirsute, extremely long-lived and so on - but I think you'd see a significant drop.</p><p></p><p>One question is would we see more or fewer humans? I think we'd actually see slightly fewer, overall, because I think there are a certain percentage of people who mostly pick human out of fear of making a "bad choice" race-wise or because they just don't want to get involved in the analysis of picking the "right race" for a class or whatever, and humans are fine. But if every race was the right race for a class or setup, then I think things would broaden out a bit.</p><p></p><p>Also realistically media trends are going to vary stuff - if we see D&D races/species as "stocks" as it were, for Dwarves are going to be way, way up right now from their usual value thanks to Delicious in Dungeon and the beloved Senshi and the badass Namari. Hell even Halflings will be going up thanks primarily to Chilchuck.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think a good case could be made that 5E doesn't really do that very well or consistently with regards to race. In fact, major story stuff about races is often just not really reflected in the abilities of a race, or only lightly. Other stuff which is barely a part of the story of the race, or just happened to be a mechanic in a previous edition is often given top billing. We might look at Yuan-Ti Purebloods (now just Yuan-Ti, I see) for example - magic resistance is not a magic story theme or even really something people are naturally going to think of re: them, but it's their most major ability.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9312405, member: 18"] It would open it up somewhat, but it wouldn't be night and day, for me. There are a few races in D&D so bad that I wouldn't even consider them, especially not after free stat choice. PHB Dragonborn are one. But there aren't many. Maybe a double-handful at most. And I tend to like outre races, and in 5E, those have also tended to be pretty good and powerful. Like, I might well play a Satyr or Yuan-Ti based on their basic concept alone - indeed, the Satyr illustration (I know it was stolen from MtG!) is so fantastic it made me immediately want to play one! This one: [ATTACH type="full" width="417px" alt="1712598181256.png"]356742[/ATTACH] Full of energy, joy, life, fun. Not this tired, generic and forgettable nonsense: [ATTACH type="full" width="257px" alt="1712598236507.png"]356743[/ATTACH] YAAAAAWN! Please no more "floating on a white background" race illustrations EVER. PLEASE WOTC. I BEG THEE! You know what I'd never play again without it offering a mechanical benefit though? A BLOODY ELF. Half-Elf or similar, sure. Not another bloody elf though! But you theory is, I think, broadly correct - most people, most of the time, are picking races primarily for the vibes, for the roleplaying, for the cool ears, and so on. There are certain races that are elevated or pushed down by being mechanically awful or great. Elves in 5E, for example, are simply boosted wildly by being overpowered. As they have been in most editions. Take aware the mechanical advantages, including their sleep advantage, and they'd still have devotees because they're pretty, anti-hirsute, extremely long-lived and so on - but I think you'd see a significant drop. One question is would we see more or fewer humans? I think we'd actually see slightly fewer, overall, because I think there are a certain percentage of people who mostly pick human out of fear of making a "bad choice" race-wise or because they just don't want to get involved in the analysis of picking the "right race" for a class or whatever, and humans are fine. But if every race was the right race for a class or setup, then I think things would broaden out a bit. Also realistically media trends are going to vary stuff - if we see D&D races/species as "stocks" as it were, for Dwarves are going to be way, way up right now from their usual value thanks to Delicious in Dungeon and the beloved Senshi and the badass Namari. Hell even Halflings will be going up thanks primarily to Chilchuck. I think a good case could be made that 5E doesn't really do that very well or consistently with regards to race. In fact, major story stuff about races is often just not really reflected in the abilities of a race, or only lightly. Other stuff which is barely a part of the story of the race, or just happened to be a mechanic in a previous edition is often given top billing. We might look at Yuan-Ti Purebloods (now just Yuan-Ti, I see) for example - magic resistance is not a magic story theme or even really something people are naturally going to think of re: them, but it's their most major ability. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think the choice of Species / Race / Ancestry has more to do with Story than Rules...
Top