Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
House Rule : Defensive Reaction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Altamont Ravenard" data-source="post: 6666877" data-attributes="member: 14700"><p>Hello all,</p><p></p><p>I wanted to know if any of you use a similar house rule in your games, or if you have any comments on the house rule below.</p><p></p><p>Context : Because of its cyclical nature, RPG combat sometimes does not well represent some cinematic aspects of fantasy combat. One example would be an evil wizard casting a fireball and the target wizard raising a protective ward of some sort to block the effects of the attack. Another example would be of a warrior going in a defensive stance as his opponent launches a barrage of attacks against him.</p><p></p><p>Other context : No one in my group has ever used the Counterspell action. I have no idea if players in other groups use this action.</p><p></p><p><u>House Rule - Defensive Reaction</u></p><p>Basically, this rule lets a character sacrifice his next Standard Action (as long as he is aware of the attack, not flat-footed and that his next Standard Action has not been sacrificed yet) to perform a defensive maneuver as an Immediate Action. This looks a lot like Readying an Action, without the need for declaring the trigger beforehand. When the character's turn comes, he still hase his Move and Swift actions. At the end of his turn, he "regains" his Standard Action so that he may sacrifice it again, or use it to make an attack on his following turn.</p><p></p><p>The action used as a Defensive Reaction cannot take more time than a Standard Action. The initiative count of the character attempting a Defensive Reaction remains unchanged.</p><p></p><p>For example, two warriors are facing a huge beast. On the beast's turn, when it decides to attack one of the warriors, said warrior could declare a defensive reaction to sacrifice his next Standard Action to go into Total Defense mode. On his turn he remains in Total Defense and has a Move action to spare.</p><p></p><p>Another example would be to Counterspell. You may, as a free action, make a Spellcraft check to identify a spell being cast. After said check, a spellcasting character could decide to make a Defensive Reaction to attempt to Counterspell the incoming spell by the usual methods.</p><p></p><p>A final example would be to cast a defensive spell in response to an offensive one. The difficulty would be to determine which spells are defensive spells. As well, I would wish to limit this Reaction so that it may not be used as an offensive maneuver (one example that comes to mind would be to cast Wall of Force in front of the wizard who just cast Fireball so that it explodes in his face).</p><p></p><p>Have you ever tried something like this?</p><p></p><p>Do you have any suggestions to improve it?</p><p></p><p>Thanks in advance,</p><p></p><p>AR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Altamont Ravenard, post: 6666877, member: 14700"] Hello all, I wanted to know if any of you use a similar house rule in your games, or if you have any comments on the house rule below. Context : Because of its cyclical nature, RPG combat sometimes does not well represent some cinematic aspects of fantasy combat. One example would be an evil wizard casting a fireball and the target wizard raising a protective ward of some sort to block the effects of the attack. Another example would be of a warrior going in a defensive stance as his opponent launches a barrage of attacks against him. Other context : No one in my group has ever used the Counterspell action. I have no idea if players in other groups use this action. [U]House Rule - Defensive Reaction[/U] Basically, this rule lets a character sacrifice his next Standard Action (as long as he is aware of the attack, not flat-footed and that his next Standard Action has not been sacrificed yet) to perform a defensive maneuver as an Immediate Action. This looks a lot like Readying an Action, without the need for declaring the trigger beforehand. When the character's turn comes, he still hase his Move and Swift actions. At the end of his turn, he "regains" his Standard Action so that he may sacrifice it again, or use it to make an attack on his following turn. The action used as a Defensive Reaction cannot take more time than a Standard Action. The initiative count of the character attempting a Defensive Reaction remains unchanged. For example, two warriors are facing a huge beast. On the beast's turn, when it decides to attack one of the warriors, said warrior could declare a defensive reaction to sacrifice his next Standard Action to go into Total Defense mode. On his turn he remains in Total Defense and has a Move action to spare. Another example would be to Counterspell. You may, as a free action, make a Spellcraft check to identify a spell being cast. After said check, a spellcasting character could decide to make a Defensive Reaction to attempt to Counterspell the incoming spell by the usual methods. A final example would be to cast a defensive spell in response to an offensive one. The difficulty would be to determine which spells are defensive spells. As well, I would wish to limit this Reaction so that it may not be used as an offensive maneuver (one example that comes to mind would be to cast Wall of Force in front of the wizard who just cast Fireball so that it explodes in his face). Have you ever tried something like this? Do you have any suggestions to improve it? Thanks in advance, AR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
House Rule : Defensive Reaction
Top