Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Help me make the fighter tick the boxes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bawylie" data-source="post: 8972574" data-attributes="member: 6776133"><p>As far back as I can recall, the Fighter’s defining feature has been the ability to use all the weapons and armors without any real limitation. In conjunction with that they get the best attack matrix and highest HP (I know about barbarian). </p><p></p><p>As the game evolved, spells and casters seemed to increase in complexity (and take up more design space) while weapons and gear became less complex, more streamlined, and now I’d have to say “boring.”</p><p></p><p>I think if you’re re-designing the fighter, you have to go back to the idea of what each weapon can actually DO in the hands of a master. And rather than a martial maneuver list, we instead say “ok you have these tools, pick out the right one for the job and get to work.”</p><p></p><p>This isn’t a full design but see if this concept grabs you in any way at all. You have a subclass of fighter called slayer - no frills. It’s a baseline fighter in all respects. Every time the slayer deals damage with a weapon, they roll twice. (So your 1d8+4 longsword instead deals 2d8+8). Its all the slayer does. And it models the very simple fighter everyone seems to think we need for beginners. The other subclass is the weapon master. The weapon master does not double the damage of each successful attack. Instead, the weapon master automatically uses whatever special utility each weapon has (say for example a polearm automatically pushes the target to the end of the pole or a hooked axe automatically pulls down a defender’s shield, negating the shield bonus). And so forth. Now instead of saving throws and all that, if the defender cannot be affected by a weapon’s utility, or resists for whatever reason (too big to push, let’s say - or not wearing a shield) - THEN the weapon master gets the double-damage instead of the effect. </p><p></p><p>Essentially I propose that the fighter recapture the identity of “best with weapons and armor” with a focused redesign of weapons and allowing additional effects as automatic riders or bonus damage, depending. </p><p></p><p>Why can’t a barbarian do these extra things? They can - but not automatically like the fighter. Their focus on rage precludes the mastery of weapons like a fighter does. Why not a paladin? Similarly they can, as actions. Their commitment to fighting evil and saving the weak and pursuing justice grants them powers and abilities such that they never master weapons for martial perfection - focusing on the Good outcome of conflict rather than conflict itself, like a fighter would. </p><p></p><p>It just occurred to me that fighters only have a list of various sticks while the casters have complex tools. Then i thought each “stick” is designed for purpose so we might as well have a class that uses them as intended. Sure we have javelins but we also have pilums which were deliberately heavy so they weighed down shields. What if we have a pilum in D&D? Maybe the weight of a pilum means a reduction in a target’s movement or flight speed! (Maybe picture Jaws with those barrels attached). </p><p></p><p>Anyway we don’t need maneuvers - we need some mastery over weapons that defines the class. The idea of extra damage (and/or) riders added to the attack (situation depending) seems like fertile ground for design. </p><p></p><p>As a side bonus, that may well introduce gear progression and crafting in a naturally progressive way that aligns with level. Versus “oh I’m level 5 and have the best gear I’ll ever have until I stumble on some magic gear that’s +1 better.”</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bawylie, post: 8972574, member: 6776133"] As far back as I can recall, the Fighter’s defining feature has been the ability to use all the weapons and armors without any real limitation. In conjunction with that they get the best attack matrix and highest HP (I know about barbarian). As the game evolved, spells and casters seemed to increase in complexity (and take up more design space) while weapons and gear became less complex, more streamlined, and now I’d have to say “boring.” I think if you’re re-designing the fighter, you have to go back to the idea of what each weapon can actually DO in the hands of a master. And rather than a martial maneuver list, we instead say “ok you have these tools, pick out the right one for the job and get to work.” This isn’t a full design but see if this concept grabs you in any way at all. You have a subclass of fighter called slayer - no frills. It’s a baseline fighter in all respects. Every time the slayer deals damage with a weapon, they roll twice. (So your 1d8+4 longsword instead deals 2d8+8). Its all the slayer does. And it models the very simple fighter everyone seems to think we need for beginners. The other subclass is the weapon master. The weapon master does not double the damage of each successful attack. Instead, the weapon master automatically uses whatever special utility each weapon has (say for example a polearm automatically pushes the target to the end of the pole or a hooked axe automatically pulls down a defender’s shield, negating the shield bonus). And so forth. Now instead of saving throws and all that, if the defender cannot be affected by a weapon’s utility, or resists for whatever reason (too big to push, let’s say - or not wearing a shield) - THEN the weapon master gets the double-damage instead of the effect. Essentially I propose that the fighter recapture the identity of “best with weapons and armor” with a focused redesign of weapons and allowing additional effects as automatic riders or bonus damage, depending. Why can’t a barbarian do these extra things? They can - but not automatically like the fighter. Their focus on rage precludes the mastery of weapons like a fighter does. Why not a paladin? Similarly they can, as actions. Their commitment to fighting evil and saving the weak and pursuing justice grants them powers and abilities such that they never master weapons for martial perfection - focusing on the Good outcome of conflict rather than conflict itself, like a fighter would. It just occurred to me that fighters only have a list of various sticks while the casters have complex tools. Then i thought each “stick” is designed for purpose so we might as well have a class that uses them as intended. Sure we have javelins but we also have pilums which were deliberately heavy so they weighed down shields. What if we have a pilum in D&D? Maybe the weight of a pilum means a reduction in a target’s movement or flight speed! (Maybe picture Jaws with those barrels attached). Anyway we don’t need maneuvers - we need some mastery over weapons that defines the class. The idea of extra damage (and/or) riders added to the attack (situation depending) seems like fertile ground for design. As a side bonus, that may well introduce gear progression and crafting in a naturally progressive way that aligns with level. Versus “oh I’m level 5 and have the best gear I’ll ever have until I stumble on some magic gear that’s +1 better.” [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Help me make the fighter tick the boxes
Top