Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Christian" data-source="post: 9330395" data-attributes="member: 6901101"><p>To start, the DM has discretion in D&D to say no. It is stated. But, if we interpret the writing:</p><p></p><p>"You have a reliable and trustworthy contact who acts as your liaison to a network of other criminals. You know how to get messages to and from your contact, even over great distances; specifically you know the local messengers, corrupt caravan masters, and seedy sailors who can deliver the message for you."</p><p></p><p>The wording is clearly problematic:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It states you have a contact (singular), yet you know local messengers, caravan masters, and sailors (plural). Now if it said, "specifically, you can use you liaison to <strong>contact</strong> local messengers..." then it might make sense. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Second, it phrases the three you know as a list. Meaning the "local" adjective does not carry over to the caravan masters and sailors. If they wrote it like this: "specifically, you know the local messengers, corrupt caravan masters and seedy sailors, who can deliver the message for you." then I think the local argument might have some weight. But it is a list, not an appositive. Therefore, local does not attach to the other items on the list.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">And let us not forget the oxymoron that is a "reliable and trustworthy" contact to a network of <strong>"other</strong>" criminals. Does that mean they are a criminal or are they referring to you as the criminal. The way this is phrased, it means the liaison is also a criminal. </li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Christian, post: 9330395, member: 6901101"] To start, the DM has discretion in D&D to say no. It is stated. But, if we interpret the writing: "You have a reliable and trustworthy contact who acts as your liaison to a network of other criminals. You know how to get messages to and from your contact, even over great distances; specifically you know the local messengers, corrupt caravan masters, and seedy sailors who can deliver the message for you." The wording is clearly problematic: [LIST] [*]It states you have a contact (singular), yet you know local messengers, caravan masters, and sailors (plural). Now if it said, "specifically, you can use you liaison to [B]contact[/B] local messengers..." then it might make sense. [*]Second, it phrases the three you know as a list. Meaning the "local" adjective does not carry over to the caravan masters and sailors. If they wrote it like this: "specifically, you know the local messengers, corrupt caravan masters and seedy sailors, who can deliver the message for you." then I think the local argument might have some weight. But it is a list, not an appositive. Therefore, local does not attach to the other items on the list. [*]And let us not forget the oxymoron that is a "reliable and trustworthy" contact to a network of [B]"other[/B]" criminals. Does that mean they are a criminal or are they referring to you as the criminal. The way this is phrased, it means the liaison is also a criminal. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Do you plan to adopt D&D5.5One2024Redux?
Top