Search results

The cover art isn't bad, though I feel it could be refined a bit more. Still not enough to make me buy the new books though.

Lost to the goblins last year, I'm afraid. He is now their king and he's never been more miserable XD

I add a few from different pantheons like the Silver Flame but usually only a case by case basis if/when a player has a good idea for it. Also, love the work you did for trying to collate the 4e lore and stuff.

I tend to either use a slightly modified 4e "Dawn War/Nentir Vale" pantheon or one of my own creation.

I am yearning for this so hard! As soon as my FLGS gets it I'm picking it up.

I never watched GoT so I will take your word for that. And I never felt that Aleena was designed for "that demographic." Her art is tame and lacking a lot of the more "iconic 80s sexy warrior lady" aesthetic (chainmail bikinis for instance, a look I could never fathom myself). And she is really...

While I think the mini looks fine, I feel that if they wanted an iconic female old school character to turn into a mini for the line I would have done Aleena. As it is this decision, while honestly rather non-controversial to me personally, seems like all it will do is sadly rile up too many...

The OGL debacle was definitely a part of it, but it has been a growing dissatisfaction with D&D overall since the end of 4e, my personal favorite edition. While I picked the core books and a number of adventures for 5e and even ran a few of them, after something like a decade it is just getting...

I just can't with 5e anymore, revision or no, so for the first time ever I will not be picking up the "new edition/revision". Once the older editions are in the CC I plan on doing what I can to complete my collections of those but otherwise I am passing on new D&D material.

Happy Gygax Day, everyone. I hope Gail eventually relents and allows Gygax's notes and maps to his Castle Greyhawk campaign to be published someday.

Generally my attitude as well. As mich as I disapprove of WotC, I have to root for them on this specific issue lest we give people like LaNasa a larger platform which is detrimental to the hobby as a whole.

This is all hilarious and I wait to see the final outcome of this all

Some good news!

Me and many MANY others would have been happy to see an "evolving take" on drow in Golarion, especially since one of their demon lords they venerated shifted alignment and ascended to godhood which would have been an amazing storyline to follow. But nope, just hit the big red retcon button.

The OGL can't be destroyed anymore though, it is in the Creative Commons. And I know Jacobs is hurt since, yeah, they were planning on doing something with the drow but I still stand by my choice to leave and go to other systems. My group is wanting me to give a few OSR games that have drow in...

Drow are being retconned out of the setting, and when asked about how it would affect drow who have appeared in game before (such as in Second Darkness) Jacobs said it would either be "never happened, was all made up" or "it was actually serpentfolk who were just DISGUISED as drow" which doesn't...

It is a matter of principle to me. Doesn't help that my mere mentioning that I like drow on other websites/forums in recent days led to getting my personal character impugned. No, after this news I've found all enthusiasm for not only the current edition but also even the previous one wilt away...

Removal of the drow has 100% killed all enthusiasm I had for not only the Remaster but Pathfinder as a whole and I am, after a decade, going to leave both 1e and 2e Pathfinder. It has been a ride but to cut one of my absolutely favorite aspects of the setting is just way too much for me. Best of...

I mean, I'm certainly no fan of 5e or any of the UA I've read for the upcoming revision, but overwhelmingly is WotC being just a terrible company overall that people are attacking.

Hope this helps shake up the fantasy RPG market more.