Search results

i find it funny that everyone seems to be complaining about optimization hounding when the point is obviously just about how the background is anti-synergistic with the feat it comes with

forts and...uh...hm. the creature's a tough one. beholders, maybe, just because they're fun and unique to dnd. in my last campaign i think i actually used dragons more then dungeons. i tend to run large locations less as proper dungeon crawls and more as swat raids. the party was gearing up to...

i don't even think that'd even be a problem if it extended the casting time, but it sounds like it doesn't. so the meteor swarm hypothetical the article poses would just play like "They're casting the spe--AAAAAND they rolled first in initiative. Welp. There goes Waterdeep."

ecmo?

classy. if the climb speed isn't applicable then...well...the climb speed isn't applicable, is it? i don't think situations where you couldn't use your climb speed anyway are exactly relevant here. maybe i wasn't clear enough about that though. yeah that's what i was thinking.

okay, but it...doesn't know if you have a climb speed. so it's not...accounting for that. if the monk also has a climb speed i don't see any reason why they couldn't reach and grab a hand hold at the end of it (assuming they could do so with their climb speed anyway). ...if you mean the monk...

it...sounds like it'd be redundant, to me. unless your regular speed is higher then your climb speed, then it just sounds like you effectively have a higher climb speed.

alright, that's what i see now

oh, well no wonder, then. you threw a cr 8 encounter against a level 3 party of 4 characters - that's beyond a deadly encounter by a5e encounter design guidelines (which also say a hard encounter - which would be cr 6 for this party - can be equivalent to a deadly encounter for a tier 1 party).

wererats are only cr2! what level was the party???

...i...i think that qualifies as a crime against humanity (or orckind/mortals in this case).

i feel like both is a bit...much? if it were ongoing damage i'd get it, but as is 15 gp per arrow AND a bonus action to light feels excessive

tony stark nic is not

uh...i downloaded the updated pdf, and there's no picture and the text is still there.

i've forgotten to ask until now (since i'm currently putting together the one shot for halloween), but... what's this supposed to mean under the entry for rindle's knife?

somehow this is simultaneously extremely punishing and barely punishing at all. like, on the one hand, disadvantage practically makes a skill useless just due to the insane swinginess, but on the other...pick con the first time, no debuff at all. pick strength the second time, barely a debuff...

yeah personally i think basic buffs like that should just be part of character progression (like pf2e's automatic bonus progression rule) so that actual magic items can do interesting stuff. if you want you could still give magic items +1 bonuses and such on top of that which can be used in case...

he said a swear and it didn't get censored. a mod might've censored it manually by now though.

HOW DO THESE KEEP GETTING THROUGH?! ARE YOU PEOPLE MAGIC?!